Talk:Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie/GA1

GA Review

Passed. BigLordFlash^talk 13:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
The prose is clear and concise, nothing to point. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
I fixed all the minor mistakes. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
It has a list of all references. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
All sentences have reliable sources. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

C. It contains no original research:
No original research. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
No copyright violations (Earwig) BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
It addresses all the main aspects. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
It's totally neutral. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
No edit wars or content dispute. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
No copyright issues. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
All images are relevant and have suitable captions. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.