Talk:Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie

Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 4, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Poster

A poster for the film can be found on IMDb, and could be used for this article. Red4Smash (talk) 02:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. BigLordFlash^talk 13:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 16:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
The prose is clear and concise, nothing to point. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
I fixed all the minor mistakes. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
It has a list of all references. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
All sentences have reliable sources. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

C. It contains no original research:
No original research. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
No copyright violations (Earwig) BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
It addresses all the main aspects. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
It's totally neutral. BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
No edit wars or content dispute. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
No copyright issues. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
All images are relevant and have suitable captions. BigLordFlash^talk 16:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlash^talk 13:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.