Talk:Red Line (CTA)

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Rapid transit Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Red Line (CTA).

On 13 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to CTA Red Line. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Untitled

for a discussion on the box with all the el lines listed, please see Template talk:CTA, especially if you have an opinion about the former interurbans being listed there Tedernst 17:00, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The link under the heading "Dan Ryan extension" about different proposals does not go anywhere.

Proposed stations in the listing

Anybody have any thoughts about adding the four proposed stations on the UPRR extension to the listing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartan S58 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transfers column in station listing section

I don't really think that it is necessary to have a transfer column in the station listing section because there is already a map in the infobox that shows transfers between the train services! Can we please discuss why that is necessary because I'm trying to improve pages on the site to make them look better! The Smell of Magic 04:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Red Line (CTA). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Red Line (CTA). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.transitchicago.com/redeis/alternatives.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100108124946/http://www.transitchicago.com/redeis/schedule.aspx to http://www.transitchicago.com/redeis/schedule.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Howard-Englewood-Jackson Park Line (CTA)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Howard-Englewood-Jackson Park Line (CTA). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Howard-Englewood-Jackson Park Line (CTA) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 06:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Howard–Englewood–Jackson Park Line (CTA)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Howard–Englewood–Jackson Park Line (CTA). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 2#Howard–Englewood–Jackson Park Line (CTA) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dicklyon (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 23:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION. The format "CTA <color> Line" is in common use amongst the media, Wikipedia disambiguation and even the CTA itself. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 18:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that this is adding any value. The CTA's train lines are known as the "Red Line", the "Blue Line", the "Brown Line" etc., and not as the "CTA Red Line". The official website and all branding material refer this way as well. "Red Line (CTA)" helps disambiguate it from other "Red Lines" around the world. Do you have any examples of how "CTA <color> Line" is being used commonplace? Silvestertaylor (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example from the CTA itself: Before entering the Loop and at the end of each line, an automated voice announcement says "Thank you for riding the CTA <color> Line." JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose, but I don't think that's convincing. I think it's reasonable for the CTA to have different spoken announcements than what's written down.

To compare, the CTA's own webpage describes it as thus:

The Red Line provides 24-hour train service between Howard on the North Side and 95th/Dan Ryan on the South Side via subway through downtown Chicago.

The CTA's branding guidelines also make it clear that it's the "<color> Line".

If there was more consensus on this change, then I will support it. Given what's available right now, I feel that making this change would only cause more confusion.

Silvestertaylor (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Voice announcements aren't a good way to determine the proper name of a line. Natural disambiguation can be helpful, but moreso when dealing with descriptive names. Mackensen (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per common names, either the Blue Line, Red Line etc. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.