Talk:Reclus (volcano)

Reclus (volcano) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 21, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reclus (volcano)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 02:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copyedit as I go; please revert any mistakes.

Characteristically, this subduction process is not accompanied by much earthquake activity: as written, this means that it is typical for subduction processes not to be accompanied by much earthquake activity. Is that the intended meaning? If so, no change is needed. Or is this saying that this particular subduction process is not characterized by much earthquake activity?

Removed the word.

outcrops in Tierra del Fuego lack biotite unlike closer deposits, which also lack mica: "also" seems wrong here; it refers to the "closer deposits", doesn't it? If so it should be cut.

Removed confusing wording.

Are the R1 eruption and the eruption mentioned at the start of "Late Pleistocene and Holocene" the same eruption? The dates are close, but you discuss them differently and don't say they're the same. If they're definitely two different eruptions, I'd say so when mentioning the second one.

Maybe. The problem with these volcanoes in southernmost South America is that their eruption chronology is usually based on remote tephra occurrences and these cannot be easily correlated. My sense is that the 12,000 BP eruption falls somewhat out of the accepted age range for the R1 eruption and is thus most likely a separate one, and I only have partial source access to the source for the latter eruption.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:54, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If the sources don't talk about the last point, I guess we can't either. Promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]