Jump to content

Talk:Rebellion Developments

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elixer

[edit]

I changed the wording of Rebellions takeover of Elixers IP. They didn't go bankrupt, they shut themselves down because no one wanted to risk publishing their "high risk" games. They had enough money left to pay redundancy packages to all their staff and shut down the business smoothly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.25.124 (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

largest independent

[edit]

"making the company the largest independent" - independent from what? what makes a company dependent or not? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.239.126.100 (talk) 15:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Independent from any other company and/or shareholders. --Lashiec (talk) 12:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lawsuits?

[edit]

Should the lawsuits mentioned here be mentioned in the article? http://forums.sinsofasolarempire.com/455527 62.198.162.25 (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subsidiaries

[edit]

Companies House lists about 30 subsidiaries, so this list is very far from complete. Richard75 (talk) 21:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard75:

  1. Please provide a link
  2. How many of those subsids are not holdings or legal placeholders?
  3. How many of those subsids are publicly aknowledged in secondary sources, such as acquisition news (remember that we are an encyclopedia)
  4. In the list I did find on first try, there were 15 subsids, of which seven are obviously holdings, and two probably (as they don't exist outside the legal filings space), Audiomotion I was able to find a source for and found two further for studios not related to the filing. Only "JCK Properties" and "Mongoose Publishing" are possible as actual subsids, but given that I couldn't find any sources, I also cannot include it. Lordtobi () 05:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Link here (a list of appointments held by one of the directors) lists 21 companies with Rebellion in their name, 5 of those also include Holdings. See what you make of it. Richard75 (talk) 18:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't it be a bit far-reaching to say that every company an individual is involved in is a subsidiary of his primary company? Presently I'd say the list is complete as far a sourcing goes. If you find another "Rebellion acquires" or "Rebellion owns" in reliable sources, feel free to add them. Lordtobi () 18:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]