Talk:Quest 2

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Carlton Wilborn (1 participant)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (24 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (6 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aqr5626. Peer reviewers: Dhanno1234, Ojg5046.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2021

This edit request to Oculus Quest 2 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hardware section has wrong date for update to 120Hz. Should be April 13, 2021, but is currently showing April 23, 2020. Scottwpalmer (talk) 13:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Field of View (degrees) spec needed

The Field of View specification is needed for better comparison with all other VR products. This is usually a numerical range measured in degrees, like 110° for example. Chaseholden (talk) 23:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source for expansion of added features

Link --uKER (talk) 21:16, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name change to Meta Quest 2.

Meta has announced the discontinuation of the Oculus brand and the Oculus Quest 2 is being renamed to Meta Quest 2. Therefore, a name change should be applied to the article.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/28/22751220/facebook-portal-oculus-quest-meta-horizon-renaming — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parttime18 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Says who? Article titles are not decided at the whim of manufacturer's marketing or branding departments. The product is still internationally marketed under the name Oculus Quest 2, and it is by far (99.9%?) the most common name for the product. This title change was unwarranted and should be reversed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.46.96 (talk) 14:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone the move, since it was over a month premature. They're not calling it the Meta Quest yet, you can have a look at the official website for proof. At this time it's still the Oculus Quest 2 (it's in the web page/window title), or simply just the Quest 2 as they seem to be referring to it for now.

According to the article linked above, they're planning for the branding change "starting 2022". Before moving this again, check your calendar to see if it's 2022, then see if they've actually started to use the branding, and if so, then move the page. --Veikk0.ma 02:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Several users have attempted to boldly move this page to "Meta Quest 2"; personally I feel this is a contravention of WP:COMMONNAME. We use the name used by the majority of secondary sources; this product was released as "Oculus Quest 2", and the sheer majority of media coverage still refers to it as such. We are not ~~Oculus'~~ ~~Facebook's~~ Meta's PR office. This product is still most commonly known as "Oculus Quest 2", and footnotes/redirects explaining the rebranding are sufficient. ViperSnake151 Talk 04:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for moving the article to Meta Quest 2. It is sold as Meta Quest 2 for almost one year now. And the majority of media articles in 2022 ist using the current and actual name. --Villem (talk) 16:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a reappraisal in compliance with the relevant policy I have changed the title of the article to Meta Quest 2. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I support the name change to Meta Quest 2. The product has been renamed for years. Metauniverso (talk) 02:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 March 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 09:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meta Quest 2 → Quest 2 – More WP:PRECISE and common name, dodges the Oculus/Meta issue entirely, "Quest 2" is already a redirect so it is unambigious. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Meta Quest 2 is the proper name of the product. Popcornfud (talk) 20:11, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Quest 2 is perfectly sufficient and unambiguous. --uKER (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.