Talk:Portal Reloaded

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portal Reloaded article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Portal Reloaded" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1

Portal Reloaded has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 31, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Carlton Wilborn (1 participant)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (24 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (6 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Reference style

I was reverted after boldly changing the article's referencing style, so I'd like to propose here to change the article's current referencing style from being list-defined to body-defined. The current style is very much unhelpful for the Visual Editor because it does not let you create or edit references, and forces the editor to use the source code editor to actually add or edit references. This is not the case with body-defined references, which lets users create or edit references in both modes. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 09:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personally as a wikitext user I find inline references much harder to edit, as it is difficult to read the text interspersed with the ungainly reference templates. There are tradeoffs to both styles, which is why WP:CITEVAR leaves that up to editor preference. Given that this article isn't frequented by a lot of people there may not be a sufficient quorum to decide one way or the other but we'll see what happens I guess. ― novov (t c) 09:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that we should wait. I'll start expanding the article using the current referencing style. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Portal Reloaded/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 18:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay

Should use consistent terminology for the multiplayer mode

Development and release

I would recommend cutting off the quote as "celebration of all [Portal's] achievements"

Reception

"Lane argued that the looks of Portal Reloaded were not on the level of Portal 2." This feels a little awkwardly placed.
"but he admitted that the additional elements in the puzzles could cause frustration occasionally." I think you could justify replacing "but he admitted that" with "but felt that"

Spotcheck

Checked the following sources, and am comfortable that the article does an adequate job citing information from these sources correctly: [1] [2] [3] [4]

@Vacant0: Due to the relative triviality of any issues I've found with the article, I'm going to pass it, though would recommend making these few fixes. Nice job. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]