The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
@Hariboneagle927: Wikipedia is not a news website, nor should it be documenting a current hearing proceedings, and any likely future developments, before the Philipine Senate committee has issued its report and we know what the outcome is. Part of the issue is that this senate hearing is a current event that is investigating criminal matters that are part of a bigger picture in relation to the parties involved. To be notable, this article about these hearings needs to demonstrate that the hearing, itself, is going to have much more than just routine coverage in the news media. Any coverage that this hearing gets needs to be in-depth, persistent and diverse as well as having some sort of lasting effect in the future. We cannot say if this will happen at the moment. I think it is speculative to confine this article to just being about the hearing, itself, which the title does, and bank on these hearings being considered notable, as this normally takes some time (months or years) to determine. Wikipedia normally writes articles about notable crimes against victims; such articles focus on the crime, not the investigation or court hearings. Also, alleging that a suspect who is accused of criminal offences needs to be carefully phrased so that is is clear who is making the allegations and that the accused person is presumed innocent until convicted of the crime(s) by a court of law. Rather than write about these proceedings it might be better to merge the content of this article into the one about the Kingdom of Jesus Christ or write a specific article about the violence concerned, which could be called something like Assault of Kingdom of Jesus Christ church members. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support this or a similar name. Maybe it would be slightly better as "Philippine Senate hearings on alleged abuses by the Kingdom of Jesus Christ"? Putting "alleged" and "abuses" together makes it a bit more clear what is being alleged. "Hearings" should be plural as there were three of them. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose suggestion, support move to "Philippine Senate hearings on alleged abuses of Apollo Quiboloy". Quiboloy is the one being sought after, not his denomination. Although undistinguishable superfically, hearings and arrest warrants are spoecifically directed to the person and not to the organization. There were also multi[ple hearings, not just one. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Philippine Senate investigation of Apollo Quiboloy would be a better title. This doesn't assume guilt or innocence and more accurately describes the proceedings, which is an investigation. The natural outcome of the investigation is assumed in the new title, regardless of that outcome, so it is more neutral. "Investigation" (and to a lesser degree "inquiry") are very commonly used to describe the proceedings. Dennis Brown - 2¢00:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Philippine Senate hearings/investigation on/of alleged abuses in the Kingdom of Jesus Christ (church/sect)" does sound better. It should be "KoJC", not just "Apollo Quiboloy", as there were other pastors mentioned in the investigation as well as other KoJC members who would commit misinformation/disinformation acts in support of their leaders. And perhaps "in" instead of "of" or "by", to say that these alleged crimes were not being committed by the church but inside the church by some church nembers. Bagoto (talk) 09:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
