Talk:Pac-Man Arrangement

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2017. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Reversal of Blinky and Clyde's names witnessed in the copy of ncv2 I have downloaded for Mame0100b. If anyone has seen copies/versions (incl. other platforms) of the game where this does not occur, please inform. Eric B 19:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I own Pac-Man Collection, and the names are reversed there, too. Odd. Jeff Silvers 10:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge

It has been proposed that this article be merged with Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2. Since nobody has bothered to do so yet, I'm setting up a discussion so we can reach a consensus on this issue. Personally, I don't feel a merge is appropriate; it might be if Pac-Man Arrangement were exclusive to Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2, but it isn't; it has appeared in Pac-Man Collection, Namco Museum Advance, and Namco Museum (128-bit version). Jeff Silvers 11:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed the merge proposal tag for the reason cited above. (It also didn't help any that the person who proposed the merge didn't bother justifying it on this talk page or the talk page for Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2.) Jeff Silvers 01:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other Pac-Man Arrangement

There are 2 completely different games called Pac-Man Arrangement, there is the arcade one that this article is about and there is another one that was originaly released on the PSP in Namco Museum Battle Collection. I think that the PSP Pac-Man Arrangement should have its own article. The reason that the arcade Pac-Man Arrangement has its own article was because it was not exclusive to the Namco Classics collection (see above posts), but the PSP Pac-Man Arrangement has been released several times on different consoles too (PSP, Xbox 360 and Iphone) so surely for the same reasons this needs an article too.

90.198.11.88 (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge notification

It has been proposed over at Talk:List of Pac-Man video games#Proposed merge with Pac-Man Arrangement that this Pac-Man Arrangement article be merged into that list of Pac-Man video games article. Editors interested in these articles are invited to weigh in. —Lowellian (reply) 03:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If anything, I think it should be merged with the Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2 article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperMarioMuseum (talk • contribs) 06:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A merge isn't an appropriate decision. Personally it would be suitable to merge if it was an exclusive to Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2, but for the fact that it was included in Pac-Man Collection and the Gamecube, Xbox and PlayStation 2 version of Namco Museum, and that according to the Namco Classic Collection Vol. 2 page, it is the most well known out of any of Namco's Arrangement titles, it should be notable enough to have it's own article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namcokid47 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]