Talk:Overeem Whisky

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 August 2024 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Australia: Tasmania Low‑importance

	Australia portal Overeem Whisky is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Prior decline due to references

This has been re-submitted with further references, however comparing it to similar Wiki pages for similar aged distilleries around the world, this article has more than enough independent references. There are quite a few references to the Overeem page itself, however these are just related to product range, not subjective opinion.

There are references to established industry media (magainzes, blogs, awards, books) as well as non-industry media - all indepedent. Abbaskip (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a poor idea to use other articles as a model or example, as those too could be inappropriate and just not addressed yet by a volunteer. There are many ways to get inappropriate articles past us, we can only address what we know about. If you want to help us, you can identify these other articles you have seen so action can be taken. We need the help. If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those that are classified as good articles, which have received community vetting. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to get further feedback on what aspects this article hasn't passed. Whilst there are references to the company's own page, and also references to articles/award pages simply mentioning Overeem (both of which I understand mean the page subject doesn't meet the criteria), there are also indepedent references to industry articles and blogs that certainly do meet the critiera (independent, focused entirely on the subject etc). Abbaskip (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can count at least five references that are in depth (primarily about Overeem Whisky), Independent, Reliable and Secondary. There are several others that meet 3 of the 4 criteria (where the subject isn't entirely Overeem). I feel like this is being denied due to the editors not being aware of the brand themselves, and the plethora of references provided (including many which aren't indepedent, for objective matters such as range) Abbaskip (talk) 08:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are generally not acceptable sources, unless they have fact checking and other editorial controls(like an editor reviewing content before it is posted). 331dot (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comment: Are any of the awards notable? Do they have Wikipedia articles? Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In all the editing you are doing , please do not lose sight of the answer to the key question "Why is this topic notable in a Wikipedia sense?"
When you answer that question, make it stand out in the article, with citation. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This just summarizes the routine activities of the business and its offerings. That does not establish notability. The awards don't contribute to notability unless the awards themselves merit articles(like Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize). 331dot (talk) 08:17, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]