Jump to content

Talk:Orlando City SC/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus appears to be move - and is in keeping with convention for other MLS teams that share a name with a lower division team. --Trödel 14:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC)


Orlando City Soccer Club (2015) → Orlando City Soccer Club – We need to move this page to Orlando City Soccer Club page, since the USL Pro team is done. I don't know how to make it so that the links to the old page stay linked to that one. Elisfkc (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 06:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
I'd support "Orlando City SC", which seems to be much more common than the full name ([1] vs. [2])--Cúchullain t/c 21:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

References

  1. ^ "MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER AWARDS EXPANSION TEAM TO ORLANDO". orlandocitysoccer.com. Orlando City Soccer Club. Retrieved 20 November 2013.

Moved to Orlando City SC

Please note per agreement above between Snowman and Elisfkc (and the lack of any other Wikipedians objecting) - I finalized the move to Orlando City SC. However, I do so noting that if there are any objections raised here we should have another proper move discussion. --Trödel 17:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Help with Move

CLICK for list of pages needing review

There is no easy way to update the links because some will need to stay and reference the new club and some will need to be changed. Please help by going through the pages from this What links here list. --Trödel 14:43, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

PS I know there are some Wikipedia edit assist tools that can help with this task - so you may want to use them - but I am unfamiliar with them.
PPS Please also make the references consistent Orlando City SC seems to be preferred over Orlando City S.C. but the latter is still in use (and sometimes in the same article as the former) - while reviewing please make these consistent. I.e. use Orlando City SC

Please update below what you are working on and when completed:

Kit Edit War

Since there seems to be the beginnings of an edit war involving multiple people over the correct kits in the infobox, let's talk about it over here.

First off, my opinion is that Walter Görlitz (talk · contribs) & Fenix down (talk · contribs) (who are both Wikipedia admins by the way) are correct to use existing templates over newly made ones. This follows the best practice lain out in the template's documentation. Also, the "specific" Orlando City kits are incorrect according to the template, which states "Club badges, sponsor logos, and manufacturer logos should never be included." Second, unless the team store and I missed something, Orlando City does not have a third kit. As such, the "specific" Orlando City kits edits are incorrect again, as they include a third kit. Elisfkc (talk) 18:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not an admin. Fenix down is.
Many club articles incorporate small logos, so that's not the worst part, but we do have images without the logos and they should be used.
The issue for me is that the kits aren't sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
It's not an edit war from my pov. My revert was to remove the additions by a known and repeated vandal of kits, whose long history in adding nonsense kits can be seen here. As far as I am concerned the current kits are fine. Fenix down (talk) 09:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleting Active Teams

Deleting Active Teams box, following the seemingly end of discussion on Talk:Sporting Kansas City/Archive 1#Infobox. If you have objections, please take it up there, so as to keep everything in one place. Elisfkc (talk) 22:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Orlando City's home Jerseys.

It has been months since the teams' 2017 jersey was released and no one had updated their jersey here. It will be carried over next season.

Their new home jersey has the similar concept of Portland's home jersey where there it has the color gold in the stripes and with a collar as well. It is like LA Galaxy's away jersey where it has various shades of the teams primary color too.

Thank you! Bluhaze777 (talk) 18:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2018

Update "All Time Orlando City SC Coaching Stats" and "All-time appearances" to include 1 draw for Jason Kreis, and 1 start for Joe Bendik (total now to 70.) Also edit both sections to read, "As of March 3, 2018". Tonescapone (talk) 12:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Merge with Orlando City SC (2010–14)

I believe this article should be merged together with the Orlando City SC (2010–14) article. It seems redundant of us to have two separate articles covering the same team over different periods of time. It would be one thing if it was where the teams had different ownership and disbanded with the rise of a phoenix club, a la AFC Wimbledon, Seattle Sounders FC or SV Austria Salzburg, but these two articles of the same involve the same ownership group. Quidster4040 (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Oppose. MLS franchises are distinct legal entities from clubs, which is the case with the Seattle Sounders (1994–2008) vs. Seattle Sounders FC, Montreal, Vancouver and Portland. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose. (1) Two distinct entities. (2) Both articles are large, and a merged article would be unnavigable. (3) Severe risk of accidental misediting, e.g. in the player and staff records. Narky Blert (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
    • @Narky Blert: (1) We're writing an article about the soccer team, not about the company or legal entity. A typical reader doesn't know/care about some legal proceedings, and has no reason to think of a club with the same name, location, owners, colors, etc as a different topic. (2) The articles aren't that large, and a lot of content is redundant. The "History" and "Colors and badge" sections both have a lot of overlap and could be consolidated. The old "Club culture" and "Players and staff" sections from the old article could be entirely dropped. After that there isn't that much more content from the old article left. The article would be longer, sure, but not that much longer. (3) Not sure what this means... –IagoQnsi (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose per previous opposes and consistent practice with MLS teams in a similar situation, like Montreal, Seattle, Vancouver, and Portland, all of whom were a case of successful minor league owners buying new MLS teams that used the same identities as their predecessors. We have separate articles for them for the same reason: a change in league in the franchise model is a logical place to have a break in the historical narrative. oknazevad (talk) 20:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Support for the same reasons as I proposed at the Minnesota United discussion. User:Oknazevad talked about the precedent for having separate articles, but frankly, I think the precedent is bad and we should consider merging/restructuring each of those articles as well. Vancouver is a great example of how confusing the current structure is—we have one article that covers the team through a name change and ~5 league changes, but then we arbitrarily start a new article for MLS. Not to mention, this precedent only exists for U.S. articles—for a long time, the rest of the world's football club articles have not moved with league changes. I don't think the lack of a promotion/relegation system in the U.S. is good enough reason to confusingly break up the articles of U.S. clubs. –IagoQnsi (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose New team with the same name doesn't make it the same team. Other MLS teams with the same names as minor league teams have separate articles. If you are so concerned, why not create a "History of soccer in Orlando" page like there is for Seattle and Vancouver? KitHutch (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Support. This isn't a new team, sources indicated that this is clearly the USL team. Orlando City to play 2014 season at Disney: "... for the 2015 season, when Orlando City is expected to be playing its first season in Major League Soccer. As for that long-awaited MLS invitation for Orlando, Rawlings said it's very close." So they are not "two distinct entities" nor new team. Business entities change their legal form all the time. The Walt Disney Company started out as a partnership under at least two names then incorporated, split into three companies, merged back together, changed its name from Walt Disney Productions to Walt Disney Company then to Disney Enterprise which then became a subsidiary (along with CC/ABC) of the new Walt Disney Company, but it is all recognized as one company. Plus, you would have a mess of Marvel Comics as during its Timely to early Marvel eras, the "company" operated under about 60 corporations - separate legal entities. Spshu (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Support Agree with above. Regardless of the de jure technical legal status, in practical terms there is only 1 entity which should be reflected in 1 article. Per WP:OVERLAP, if "There are two or more pages on related subjects that have a large overlap. Wikipedia is not a dictionary; there does not need to be a separate entry for every concept." BLAIXX 02:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Montreal Impact (1992–2011), Minnesota United FC (2010–16), Portland Timbers (2001–10), Seattle Sounders (1994–2008), Vancouver Whitecaps (1986–2010) all have separate articles. No reason Orlando City SC (2010–14) should go against consensus. Joeykai (talk) 16:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Orlando_City_SC/Archive_1&oldid=1235794401"