Talk:Norse Peak

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Burned trees on the west slopes of Norse Peak

... that Norse Peak (pictured) is the namesake of a wilderness area, wildfire, and a fleece jacket?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/He Fucked the Girl Out of Me
- Comment: no point in running it without the picture

Created by Buidhe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 255 past nominations.

(t · c) buidhe 03:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I'll review this one. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1. New enough and long enough? Created on Jan 29, which was less than 7 days ago. Google Docs gives 1900+ characters. Y
2. Well sourced, neutral, BLP-compliant and copyvio free? It looks like there's just enough here for WP:GNG. I spotchecked the sources and they verify the text. I'll note that I don't usually edit about mountains, so I'm less familiar with the reliability of some sources. That said, the only one that gives me definite pause is the last citation to GearLab because it's a product review site that earns commissions on affiliate links: [1]
3. Presentable? Y
4. I don't see a source for this hook specifically? I'm assuming that one is meant to just look at the sources contained within the article?
5. The image licensing looks fine Y
6. QPQ? Y
I'd like to hear from Buidhe about points 2 and 4 before I pass this. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:32, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. GearLab is cited only for the existence of this now-discontinued product, for which it is IMO a reliable source. The website is credible and it was actually cited in multiple academic studies: [2][3]. There are three separate sources supporting the hook content, which are all present in the article. (t · c) buidhe 04:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With the above explanations, I think this is fine. I'll mark this

. I encourage the person officially promoting this to do their own checks as I've only reviewed a handful of DYKs before, being relatively new to the QPQ process. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 04:57, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]