Talk:Nettelhorsterbrug

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

speedy keep, 1 March 2024, see discussion.
keep, 23 February 2024, see discussion.

On 1 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2024 Lochem bridge collapse to Nettelhorsterbrug. The result of the discussion was moved.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Bridges and Tunnels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 1 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 13:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Lochem bridge collapse → Nettelhorsterbrug – As many pointed out at the AfD, the current focus of the article is wrong. The text has already been improved. Kudos to all who worked on that!!! For a rename, Nettelhorst Bridge sounds better, however, not enough sources seem to support that name. So we probably should default to the long and complex Dutch name. If you beg to differ, I will not hold it against you! :-) gidonb (talk) 04:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to Nettelhorsterbrug in keeping with AfD, name in keeping with WP:COMMONNAME, however would of course not be against English-variant Nettelhorst Bridge either. waddie96 ★ (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not enough established usage of Nettelhorst Bridge in my view, so per WP:USENATIVE support move to Nettelhorsterbrug. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Crash, not collapse

The article holds that part of the bridge collapsed. As far as I know, a building or construction that has been (partly) completed, may collapse, but a construction element hoisted up to be put in place can crash, but not collapse. My understanding is that a bridge element that was being hoisted, crashed after some connection to a crane failed.Redav (talk) 11:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]