Talk:Naw Kham

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Myanmar Low‑importance

Naw Kham is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Alleged?

Was Naw Kham the actual leader of the trafficking ring or was he just accused of being so? In other words, did he admit to his crimes? I would be curious to know, as it pertains to the language in this article. Also, it would help to have a source for the first sentence besides a news network run by the Chinese State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. Cheers, ask123 (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you would rather have a source that's controlled by the same people that's funding your politicians? Be my guest. 184.64.81.44 (talk) 03:05, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Confession" is something they always tout in China. Why anyone in this day would believe a confession while in the hands of the authorities in China is beyond me. In fact, given that the end result was that China is now jointly patrolling an area not in their territory but that is very useful as a shipping/trade waterway, I would not be at all surprised if it was the Chinese government themselves who set this whole thing up so that they could make justified incursion into the area. Added to that the benefit of being able to drum up nationalistic tendencies already strong in the country, where they are told the whole world has discriminated against them for ever and is afraid of their new power. It's a win-win for them. I have no doubt that Naw Kham was guilty of this and worse and have no sympathy for him, but I suspect the crime in this case at least goes a lot deeper than just some easily caught pirates.24.85.252.83 (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baseless conspiracy theories with no actual proof. 95.180.83.114 (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naw Kham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121227174728/http://mizzima.com/news/regional/8639-burmese-drug-lords-final-appeal-rejected.html to http://www.mizzima.com/news/regional/8639-burmese-drug-lords-final-appeal-rejected.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]