Talk:My.Games

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Solo leveling: Unlimited (2 participants)
Game Sack (3 participants)
Delibird (10 participants)
Melee weapon (3 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants)
Julia Chang (7 participants)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (7 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (10 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This article in its current state is literally just an advertisement. This long article was written in its entirety by an editor with a very sparse editing history on the English Wikipedia (this was originally created by the same editor on the Russian Wikipedia and was also made in basically a single edit, indicating meticulous offline preparation) and is littered with textbook corporate speak such as "My.Games' diverse portfolio features games of various genres for all platforms", "Mobile games remain its key growth driver", extensive use of the word "portfolio", etc. Half of these citations are either press releases or from sources whose reliability is questionable at best (such as App2Top, a sketchy site which literally – on its homepage – advertises its service of buying illegitimate installs of mobile apps). Meanwhile, many of the reliable sources that do mention this company such as Nintendo Life and Eurogamer do so only in the most shallow of passing, and the PCGamesN article outright admits that its content is commissioned based on outgoing links, automatically rendering it not independent.

This subject could potentially meet notability guidelines, but given how polluted throughout with ostensible undisclosed paid editing this article is and given how much shorter it would be without all the complete disregard for WP:BALASP through inflation with press releases, deleting this article then leaving it up to an unpaid editor to recreate it should they choose to do so would be the best option, unless the article's creator is willing to promptly do this themself. Leaving it up to a volunteer editor to painstakingly weed out the offending content from this ostensibly WP:PAID, WP:REFBOMBed article – essentially having them borderline rewrite it entirely – would be a mockery of the project's integrity. This article – whether actually paid or not – is a press release masquerading as an encyclopedic entry.

For these reasons, I will not mark this article as reviewed and encourage fellow new page reviewers to follow suit..

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 04:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]