Talk:Multiple integrated laser engagement system
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
On 6 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Comments from 2006
[edit]I was wondering if anyone knew about a place where a civ can study combat with miles. I would be intrested to try it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.74.114 (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
How commonly used is it? -Toptomcat 20:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Classifying
[edit]- I re-classed this as a B-class in quality. It MAY only be a Start-class because of B-class criteria #1, "It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. " I think that this is met (barely) by the list of external links. It needs to be much better, but since the article meets the other four B-class criteria and is significantly better in quality than the simple Start-class criteria, I believed this to be appropriate. VigilancePrime (talk) 03:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Pakistan?
[edit]Well the Army regulars might not use it but this image shows a Pakistani SSG squad during an exercise with MILES attatched to their M4 carbines
IMAGE CHANGED i dont know why but the image showed some fruit sellers instead,anyway http://www.statesman.com.pk/pictures/Px06-035.jpg
Irish Army?
[edit]Back up the list of users with sources or don't type them in the first place, to my knowledge, and 5 years in the RDF, neither the Irish RDF or PDF use the MILES system.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Multiple integrated laser engagement system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006114119/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/MultipleIntegratedLaserEngagement/index.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/MultipleIntegratedLaserEngagement/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119045217/http://www.saabgroup.com/Global/Documents%20and%20Images/Land/Training%20and%20Simulation/Live%20Training/CVTESS_web.pdf to http://www.saabgroup.com/Global/Documents%20and%20Images/Land/Training%20and%20Simulation/Live%20Training/CVTESS_web.pdf/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Multiple integrated laser engagement system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419222541/http://www.megaforce.in.th/ to http://www.megaforce.in.th/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 6 January 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. – robertsky (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Multiple integrated laser engagement system → Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System – Revert unexplained undiscussed move. It is a proper noun. Schierbecker (talk) 08:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- If it is a proper noun, then why isn't it capitalized in the article text? Bensci54 (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:CAPITALIZATION,
Article titles should be in sentence case, not title case
. Unless the title is a proper name, which I doubt. Vpab15 (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)