Talk:Mount Tai

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mount Tai article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

World Heritage Sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dai Miao (temple)

Dai Miao is probably important enough to warrant its own article. I've never been, nor have I really read much on it. Somebody with a knowledge of the temple should remove the redirects and write it (then link to it from this article). Bobak 02:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second this. If the Dai Miao doesn't get its own article, it should at least be mentioned in the opening blurb of this article, because I was astonished to be redirected as I was. ^L_Wizard @ 07:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a temporary fix (some 2 years after the complaint was lodged) I have set the redirect to jump to the correct section within the article. Mutt (talk) 06:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive plagiarism?!?

Hi there.

I've just noticed that virtually all of the content on this page is directly lifted from http://www.mount-tai.com.cn/en/index.html

In the page's history, the major change is from this version: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Mount_Tai&oldid=11921363 to this version: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Mount_Tai&direction=next&oldid=11921363

The editor (username=RolfMueller) labels this edit a "complete re-write." Is there any way to verify the veracity of this claim? How can we know if mount-tai.com plagiarized wikipedia or vice-versa?

Not sure what to do about this.

142.165.169.10 (talk) 22:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to know which one came first. The English at the Chinese site on Mount Tai is too good. I've never seen a Chinese-based site using such flawless English.

If you look here, you can see something closer to what you might expect: [1]. Pretty good, but still not very natural (e.g., "It's a precious cultural heritage of Chinese nation.")

So my suspicion is that the Chinese site has copied from Wikipedia. Or perhaps Rolf Mueller took the original text from the Chinese site, cleaned it up and rewrote it, and put it on Wikipedia. It was then copied back to the Chinese site. Far fetched? Maybe. But unless you can go back and see what the Chinese site was when Rolf Mueller 'rewrote' the article, it's hard to know who did the plagiarising. Why don't you ask Rolf Mueller?

Bathrobe (talk) 02:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

translation of "Tai Shan Bei Dou"

Part of the article says

"泰山北斗" (lit. Mount Tai & Northern Fight)

I don't think the translation is accurate. I think the "北斗" ("Bei Dou") refers to the northern star 北斗星 (http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8C%97%E6%96%97%E6%98%9F). The entire expression refers to the steadfast unchanging nature of Mount Tai and the Northern Star (cf. Shakespeare: "constant as the northern star") and is used to describe leaders of the community, role models, large historical organizations such as the Shaolin monks, etc.

I note that 斗 "dou" also happens to be the Simplified Chinese word for 鬥 "dou", which means fight, but I don't think it's used in this context. It's less confusing in Chinese writing that uses the Traditional writing, where "tai shan bei dou" is still written 泰山北斗, using the 斗 even though 鬥 is a valid word. In this case it literally means a sort of measuring cup, i.e. "northern scoop" (as in the constellation, Big Dipper). In fact, in Cantonese 斗 is pronounced differently from 鬥, and I have yet to hear any Cantonese speaker say 泰山北鬥.

Can anyone confirm or refute this? Wiki88V (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Famous people's calligraphy on Mount Tai

One of the Hui Muslim General Ma Fuxiang's works in Chinese calligraphy was auctioned at Christies, a rending of the Chinese character for "Tiger". The Lot Notes states that Mount Tai's Jade Emperor Peak also has one of his calligraphic works located there.

http://www.christies.com/lotfinder/paintings/ma-fuxiang-one-stroke-tiger-5347715-details.aspx

Rajmaan (talk) 21:51, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Tai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/19970710090037/http://www.wcmc.org.uk/protected_areas/data/wh/taishan.html to http://www.wcmc.org.uk/protected_areas/data/wh/taishan.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mount Tai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like more pictures of Mount Tai?

I have some beautiful original pictures that I took of Mount Tai when I lived out there in China around 2015 learning kung fu. I would be happy to contribute them to Wikipedia, they are of excellent quality. If anyone can provide some guidance on how to properly suggest additional images be added (specifically, of the sunrise and the surrounding peaks that poke out above the clouds, and more pictures of the hike up) I would love to add them. My sincerest gratitude to you all for producing such a high-quality article about this beautiful and sacred place.

Edit: I actually figured out how to upload files, just would like to learn the proper method for suggesting their inclusion in the article.

Keshav Saharia (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Queshav[reply]

@Queshav I'm not sure if you still need help with this, but generally you can upload files directly to Wikimedia Commons or Wikipedia, and then add them in the article yourself. No need to ask. The tutorial is at WP:PIC, you can just copy one of the lines of code and edit the parameters, or you can use the Visual Editor and press the Insert > Images and media button at the top of the screen. Toadspike (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Leg" and "Leg Dynasty" mentioned, with no explanation as to what the heck that is??

Did there used to be a section introducing and explaining the term, or...??? As it stands now, the article is completely baffling on this point. 2001:569:BE5C:CC00:F2DE:F1FF:FE2F:EBFC (talk) 07:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's nonsense. That was vandalism that slipped through. Thanks for catching it. I deleted. JArthur1984 (talk) 12:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Complete random nonsense? Mere vandalism? I would've though there'd be *some* explanation, in terms of some *intended* meaningful addition, just obscured by some translation failure or something like that..? 2001:569:BE5C:CC00:F2DE:F1FF:FE2F:EBFC (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]