Talk:Mount Pisgah (Lane County, Oregon)

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Kesey Memorial citation

The Jed Kesey Memorial on the summit... discussed in this newspaper article: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19901009&id=MAIzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ZusDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3753,1866051 - Sparkssc

Other Mt. Pisgahs

The other Oregon Mt Pisgah: What about the one in the Ochoco Mountains? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.74.27 (talk) 05:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, and Google Maps recognizes that. (There are still more Mount Pisgahs in Oregon. You can find them in this database.) If you're interested, you could create a disambiguation page for the landmarks. Jsayre64 (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going to say eventually this needs to be a dab page to:

Valfontis (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be willing to do that. So I should move Mount Pisgah (Oregon) to Mount Pisgah (Lane County, Oregon), then update links by referring to Special:WhatLinksHere/Mount Pisgah (Oregon), and then change the page with URL https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Mount_Pisgah_%28Oregon%29&redirect=no to a dab page listing the three Pisgahs, right? Except, what about the existing dab page Mount Pisgah? Jsayre64 (talk) 00:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. You can leave the Mount Pisgah dab page with the Oregon dab link and change the description to something like "one of three summits in Oregon". Or if you go ahead and create the other two articles, take the approach they did with Pennsylvania. I haven't checked the dab page guidelines lately but that shouldn't upset anybody too much. Valfontis (talk) 00:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I don't think I screwed anything up too badly. Jsayre64 (talk) 00:42, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems legit, thanks! The dab folks always seem to come along eventually and clean things up. Valfontis (talk) 01:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Pisgah (Lane County, Oregon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]