Talk:Monster of the Deep: Final Fantasy XV

Monster of the Deep: Final Fantasy XV has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 4, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Monster of the Deep: Final Fantasy XV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 15:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be doing the review of the article. Since I haven't done one in a while it might take some time but I'm pretty sure it will pass. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Judgesurreal777: First things first. I find this article in good shape but there are few issues that need to be solved:

Per WP:Lead, an introduction to the reception section could be added to the second paragraph or simply a third paragraph.
Can "Premise and gameplay" be expanded? I haven't played the VR but it seems like quite small based on the description. Maybe adding a description would help. to add more coverage similar to what we did with G-Bike where we even could add gameplay image and illustrate it.
I already added Tabata's image.
The prerelease section seems a bit simple with quotes and the idea of "x said this, y said that". Try rearranging it a bit like the the postrelease in. Try finding a point in common like a subject or just positive and negative.

Other than that, I might give the article another look but I think it's in good shape. The references seem to be reliable.Tintor2 (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Tintor2:, I think I got all of your requested changes, let me know what you think now! :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Let me go back to basics since it's been long since I reviewed an article.

1. Well written: Passes Every issue I had with the writing was solved. I managed to understand everything from this article.
2. Verifiable with no original research: Every sentence uses citations with generalizations properly used.
3. It has proper coverage of the game, including making, reception, and further depiction of gameplay.
4. Neutral: I managed to see it well written with the reception addressing well the reviews.
5. Stable: No edit wars.
6. Illustrated: Both logo and gameplay images provided.

Good workTintor2 (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]