Jump to content

Talk:Mirror armour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There seem to be two distinct types of 'mirror' armor: One more analogous to a coat of plates--worn over a full suit of chain mail; and a second similar to banded mail, where the metal plates are held together by chainmail. Theblindsage (talk) 03:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • historically both types (with rectangular and round mirrors) are evolved from single mirror worn like phalera, so both types called as "mirrors", despite of completely different construction. (Idot (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]
  • they do not held by chainmail, they have backing made from chainmail or cloth, but held by leather laces hidden under backing. so mirror armours with chainmail backing look like plated mail, while mirror armours with cloth backing look like brigandine. even more backing could be made from both cloth and chainmail like japanese brigandine - tatami-do (Idot (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]
  • or do you mean as "analogous to a coat of plates" oriental brigandines with riveted or sewn additional mirror plates, like this ? in this case mirrors are not additional armour which could be worn over chainmail or brigandine, but a part of brigandine (Idot (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

History

[edit]

The history part of this lemma is extremely incomplete and eurocentric (did not know Armenia was in Europe by the way). The oldest pectoral discs, squares and what nots appear in Asia, in the Middle East, in early Iranian and Neo-Assyrian art. Pectoral discs have been in constant use in South Asia since antiquity as well (see fat little demons on the Sanchi Buddhist stupa and warriors on Hindu temples f.i. Deogarh) into the modern period, and from there traveled to Southeast Asia and China, and were probably reintroduced from South Asia to Central Asia and the Middle East in the medieval period.87.212.52.128 (talk) 06:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kremlin Armoury 049.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Kremlin Armoury 049.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:23, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mirror armour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]