Talk:Mike Thornton (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Assumed office" date

If the result wasn't out till next day, does he really count as having assumed office on 28 Feb as the infobox says? PamD 11:04, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the merit in your argument. However if you look at other current MP infoboxes the date of the poll, not of the declaration, is given as the start of the term. That is the convention adopted by this site. It would seem undesirable to add a source of confusion, by trying to work out the date of each declaration. --Gary J (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Thornton (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 June 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved TonyBallioni (talk) 04:28, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Thornton (politician) → Mike Thornton – Only subject called Mike, rather than Michael. Unreal7 (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - don't see how this could be disputed. jamacfarlane (talk) 04:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a common enough name and no longer MP. The new throws up golfers and American football players before this former backbencher. In ictu oculi (talk)
Oppose per In ictu oculi. In particular, my top Google results for "Mike Thornton" (in quotes) are mostly about Michael E. Thornton, who uses the name "Mike" professionally (e.g. his website http://mike-thornton.com). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 10:04, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support with hatnote "No longer MP" is just recentism. If "Mike Thornton" is the name Michael E. Thornton or other Michael Thorntons are better known by then arguably they should be moved as well / instead - but since nobody is suggesting that I don't see a reason for this article not to be moved. I recommend adding Template:About if the move goes ahead. Waggers TALK 10:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Sole subject of Wikipedia biographical entry who bears this exact name, thus obviating the need for the qualifier "(politician)". No convincing evidence has been presented that any of the other Michael Thorntons have been known to the public as "Mike". Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence has indeed been presented above that Michael E. is at least sometimes known as Mike, and furthermore WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT states: The fact that an article has a different title is not a factor in determining whether a topic is primary (emphasis mine). The fact that the politician is the only one who is more commonly called Mike than Michael (WP:COMMONNAME) does not imply anything about whether people who search for Mike are more likely to be looking for him or for someone else. Michael E. gets 15x as many page views as (politician) overall [1]; to put it another way, if only 7% of the people looking for Michael E. use "Mike" to search for him, that would mean page views for "Mike" are equally divided between the two even though "Mike" wouldn't be WP:COMMONNAME for Michael E. under that scenario. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking into consideration this argument, the two "Oppose" votes as well as the "Support with hatnote" vote by Waggers which includes the text, "If "Mike Thornton" is the name Michael E. Thornton or other Michael Thorntons are better known by then arguably they should be moved as well / instead", I am submitting the RM Michael E. Thornton → Mike Thornton (Medal of Honor) at Talk:Michael E. Thornton#Requested move 27 June 2018 which, if successful, will make this RM a moot point. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't feel this person is prominent enough to be the primary topic for Mike Thornton, the current status where this page redirects to the disambiguation page Michael Thornton is better. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. See Talk:Michael E. Thornton#Requested move 27 June 2018. The politician is not especially well-known, so no primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 19 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 03:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Thornton (politician) → Mike Thornton – I did this before, but I genuinely believe the argument is enough. See Mike Posner as another example. Unreal7 (talk) 20:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose plenty of Mike Thorntons worldwide. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The move would just cause confusion and risk creation of bad links. Narky Blert (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.