Jump to content

Talk:Midnight Club: Los Angeles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMidnight Club: Los Angeles was a Video games good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 14, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed

Complete Edition

[edit]

How come there is no mention of the new Complete Edition?Qwertyfish11 (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oh, should have looked here first... Anyway I have added a section for it, feel free to edit if you find any mistakes and/or updates.91.105.163.185 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it looks good to me, do you have any idea what is included in the package? Qwertyfish11 (talk) 01:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L.A. street map

[edit]

Regarding the statement "The Los Angeles map is considered one of the most detailed and accurate versions of L.A. yet," is there a source for it? The map in True Crime: Streets of LA is much more accurate. Midnight Club has a good map, but is missing landmarks like MacArthur Park and the La Brea tarpits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.14.148.51|207.14sed much in international English.) I honestly do not know what that sentence is trying to say. 82.46.76.11 (talk) 10:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

plot

[edit]

that plot description is way too long and detailed. definitely needs to be shortened. -- ZookPS3 (talk) 17:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


this is the best goddamn sentance ever: A 30 year old man East Coast to move to Los Angeles. While the character is left nameless, he takes a major role in the game. In the intro of the game, he is on the phone with the, unknown at the time, Los Angeles City Champ, Booke, telling him to meet at a fast-food restaurant named Carney's Express Limited. He hooks the protagonist character up with three cars, one to pick, in the beginning of the game 116.212.212.41 (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soundtrack Notes

[edit]

the soundtrack list has been an essential in every article of this game, so please do not delete it for the excuse of "no one is reading it"; also, for those who have the time and the game, can you help on categorizing the list, the in-game genre's list were 10 or 12, if you can put bulletin or other readable way to move each song to its genre list, i wish i can do it myself but my Xbox got the RRoD, and most of the websites concerning the game only list the songs without categorizing it Silver mask cube (talk) 00:25, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Club: LA Japan Release

[edit]

Midnight Club: Los Angeles did in fact have a seperate release, from the October 21/24, 2008 release, in Japan on February 5, 2009 for the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. Midnight Club: LA Remix also came out in Japan for the PSP on the same day, February 5, 2009.

However, the game was published by Japanese video game company Spike, and not Take 2 Games.

Official Japanese Website: http://www.midnightclubla.jp/
Official Midnight Club: LA Japan box art: http://www.spike.co.jp/data/PS3MCLA.jpg
Publisher Spike (company) Official Website w/ game:http://www.spike.co.jp/game/details.php?id=143&view=year&year=2009
Spike (publisher) wikipedia page: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Spike_(company)
Famitsu score of Midnight Club: LA in Japan on January 27th, 2009 (before it came out on February 5, 2009): http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=350394
VG Chartz number of sales of the Japan version:
http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=14168&region=All
http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=13115
http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=31693
Midnight Club: LA Japan First Week Sales Chart: http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=2974

The point being made is that the JP release isn't notable for the infobox, not that it didn't happen. Thanks! Fin© 08:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bold textwhy are you so lame? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.209.182 (talk) 01:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  midnightClub: Los Angeles (new section)

best raching game ever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.199.71 (talk) 11:03, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Online community (Racing Crews)

[edit]

Online gameplay Is very popular among players, many have made " crews" who would race against other crews in a series of races called crew battles. The fastest crew in the game history is the League of KMB, technically not a Crew due to it being a conjunction of multiple Gaming Clans/Crews from MCLA and across the Playstation Network. The League of KMB are known to be the worlds largest gaming clan, and only Clan League Organization to exist. Their most notable members are PSN ID: KMB_TM-N-E_CANO, KMB_TM-N-E_Nava, KMB_TM-N-E_smoKE, KMB_S-C-K_KING87, KMB_TGR_KILLA, KMB_RDrZ_BOSS-, KMB_RDrZ_OUTLAW, and KMB_PRC_LUNY. They are known to have beaten every crew on Midnight Club and if not ending, merging their defeated opponents after victory. They are the only sponsored group on Midnight Club, by The Federation of Clans. Network (TFoC)(TFoC Network). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19undertaker86 (talkcontribs) 21:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show that any reliable source (magazine, newspaper, etc) has published anything about these people?—Kww(talk) 22:43, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Midnight Club: Los Angeles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Teancum (talk · contribs) 15:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
There are issues with MOS:NUMBERS and WP:YOU.
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:

References are not formatted properly. Access dates, authors, and date of publication should be present where possible.

  1. B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
There are very large portions of the prose that are unreferenced, and 20 references seems rather small for the size of the article. Additionally very few of the review scores are referenced.
  1. C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  3. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
While the reviews all give very high marks, no mention is made of any criticism
  1. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  2. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Rationale for the gameplay image could be drastically improved. Additionally this seems to be more of a promotional screenshot and doesn't demonstrate gameplay.
  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
The secondary box are is unnecessary per WP:NFCC and should be removed.
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Unfortunately due to the number of issues I have to quick-fail this article. I will say that the improvements made over the last while have made it a much better, more informative read, but it just hasn't hit GA-standards as of yet. Keep hope alive, though. There's been made great strides made here. --Teancum (talk) 15:49, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Midnight Club: Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Midnight Club: Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]