Jump to content

Talk:Melania Trump replacement conspiracy theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

amazing

[edit]

this is one of the dumbest conspiracy theories I've seen get cites to CNN level - David Gerard (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cites based on actual widespread discussion by proponents. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
oh, totally, totally! You've now got me thinking about it and working on it ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe rename to "body double" theory. Started with supposed body double on certain occasions. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@David Gerard: Think it's getting there. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is :-) More shoring up wouldn't hurt of course. Keep title at "replacement" I think, title is fine - I mean, it can be changed later - David Gerard (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
more sources: BBC, Snopes, Yahoo! Style
probably not an RS: Hollywood life
this is Tracey Ullman doing a sketch: [1] [2] was this ever noted in an RS anywhere? - David Gerard (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Added BBC. Hyperbolick (talk) 13:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the Ullman sketches predate the conspiracy theory, so probably shouldn't go here - David Gerard (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Hyperbolick (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clone

[edit]

"Clone" reported in unreliable sources [3],[4] but not RS. Remove? Hyperbolick (talk) 17:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yeah ... I'd only put in what we can from RSes, even if the RSes are basically making fun of it - David Gerard (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Think it's ready. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
gi's a moment, just gonna review it and all sources - David Gerard (talk) 22:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I don't think it's quiiite ready - the second and third paragraphs of the "Origins" section, their references don't refer to this conspiracy theory at all, only to odd behaviour on Donald Trump's part. I think we'd need a ref linking this incident to the conspiracy theory, and we don't appear to have one.
I cut the James Gunn quote because it was pretty much fluff, cited to a trivial media site - David Gerard (talk) 22:31, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Categories?

[edit]

Possible categories to add to this page? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tried some. Hyperbolick (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 September 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Melania Trump replacement theoryMelania Trump replacement conspiracy theory – This is obviously a conspiracy theory that has no credibility; therefore, its not just a theory it's a conspiracy. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 02:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.