Jump to content

Talk:Megijima

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 29 March 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]



MegijimaMegishima – This article should be renamed to be Megishima, because it is written "めぎしま" in hiragana in Japan - that means it should be written "Megishima" in English. See Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism's official site. miya (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 11 April 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. User:Miya performed the move on 28 April 2015. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]



MegishimaMegi Jima – A more reliable source for MEGI"JI"MA is found after the last request (above). Last time I requested move from Megijima to Megishima, but I found GAZETTEER OF JAPAN by the Government of Japan(the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, and the Hydrographic and Oceanographic Department of the Japan Coast Guard) based on the resolution of the United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names, which authorizes "Megi Jima" (see GAZETTEER OF JAPAN (p.45). "しま/じま" (Shima/Jima) means an "island". miya (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I strongly oppose inserting a space in the name. If you look at that list, a space is inserted in almost every name, so it is not a good example.
I am not surprised that different Japanese ministries give different "official" spellings. The Japanese wiki says that "shima" is the official name (quoting the MILT source), but notes that it is often pronounced "jima". I think it should remain the same, with our article also noting the difference when pronounced (if we can find a source for the claim). AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
MegishimaMegijima
Is this OK?--miya (talk) 16:54, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Megijima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]