Jump to content

Talk:Medal of Honor: Frontline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:MOHFbox.jpg

[edit]

Image:MOHFbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ON PS3 NOW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.173.44.91 (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Rated Start

[edit]

This article did not qualify as B class. It is poorly written, the plot section had POV issues, some of it reads like a walkthrough, has second person references, and has only two citations. It needs a better reviews or reception section, with more opinions. With POV sentences like, "In one of the most thrilling FPS rail sequences." or second person references like "By then bullets are whizzing by you and few pass but luckily, you are one of them.", this does not even remotely qualify as B class. I cleaned up some of this, but not enough to get it up to B class. Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was Utah

[edit]

I thought the game started at Utah beach, not Omaha.

There is no Utah beach you fucking idiot. 95.148.200.103 (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong.Halofanatic333 (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There certainly was a Utah Beach. Let's try to keep this discussion civil. :) Lord of laziness (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. However, one needs to be sure before flinging an f-bomb. Halofanatic333 (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I just had to lol at that. And comment on it. As stated above, there WAS a Utah beach... YuriKaslov (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Random weapon specs?

[edit]

I don't know why there is a large block of poorly-formatted specifications on in-game weapons, but I'm removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord of laziness (talk • contribs) 00:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel words?

[edit]

Does anyone have any objection to removing the weasel words box? I think the weasel words have been removed by now, and I'll remove the box within a week unless someone thinks there are still weasel words. Lord of laziness (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

[edit]

I removed the "no citations" box and replaced it with an "needs additional citations" box. Lord of laziness (talk) 19:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Video Games assessment

[edit]

I don't have a lot to say here. The content looks much better, but given that it only has two references this will have to remain Start class. I'd say it needs at least 10 reliable sources before we can bump it to C class. --Teancum (talk) 14:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Medal of Honor: Frontline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Medal_of_Honor:_Frontline&oldid=1203423272"