Talk:Marion Hammer

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability concerns addressed

I looked around and found that there have been many articles written about Hammer by reliable independent sources. I picked the best of these as references for the most basic facts about Hammer's career, avoiding (I hope) all of the puffery that filled the previous versions of this article.

If someone else agrees that this material addresses the concern over Hammer's notabiliity, I hope that person will consider removing the notabiliity tag. 71.197.166.72 (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added it in March. Because of your additions, I've now removed it. Felsic2 (talk) 21:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate biography?

SkippG has removed large amounts of material. I'm opening this discussion so that they can seek consensus for their proposed changes.- Mr X 🖋 18:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of wording in Harassment Section

This section appears to be a bit out of date, and the first paragraph assumes that her claims of harassment are accurate and uses wording calling her a "target" and treating her fear of physical violence as well-founded without explanation to back that up. In my opinion, the section needs to be expanded or reworded to be more clearly neutral.

Section 2.3 also seems to have some neutrality issues and could be organized much better. Michaelwallace22 (talk) 23:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]