Talk:Mario & Wario

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (6 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Assessment

I think this should be Start, not C. I am not too experienced, but this doesn't seem to be on the level of other C-articles, despite Thomas' tireless work (though I have no doubt it will be in the future). Please discuss, at least help me understand the assessment. :) Salvidrim (talk) 14:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Assessment#Quality scale is the bar I used in assessing the article. The definition of a C-class article is quite a low standard, with the expectation that there are still noticeable problems to fix. To me, the main problem is simply a lack of information available, which isn't a reflection on the quality of what is actually in the article. Prose style, formatting and MOS-compliance are all of a higher-than-C standard, but brevity and a lack of broad coverage keep it below that. Given that the next step up from C-class, B-class, has a well-defined checklist of criteria as opposed to the "go with your gut" Stub/Start/C ratings, the quality of C-class article can vary dramatically, from those which just clear the bar, to those which are essentially B-class but miss one criterion, or anywhere in between. GRAPPLE X 14:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation! So C-class needs to be considered 'in relation' to the amount of information reasonably available. I see! :) Salvidrim (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mario & Wario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mapno

The Sprites here would be used for the Russian Mario bootlegs (For the description, go to “list of unofficial Mario media” and then go to talk) 2601:646:C980:4C20:7935:DA49:6FDE:DBC3 (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]