This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This isn't a reliable source for her birth year. It lists both 1871 and 1873 but as a typo, not because there is historical discrepancy, though that certainly is separately the case. czar08:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A variety of facts throughout this article need updating. For example, Goldsmith was born in Saint Petersburg in July 1871, not 1862. She was an anarcho-syndicalist for sure, but also an avowed anarchist communist. She probably shouldn't be described as a Jewish anarchist, as she was born to a Russian (non-Jewish) mother. Her father was born Jewish but was baptized well before her birth into Lutheranism along with his siblings. Her mother did train in medicine but also completed a PhD at Zurich in biology (her thesis was in botany). Marie did, in fact, naturalize as French in 1924. A new biographical article in Black Flag magazine covers many of these points (and more) and points directly to archival sources for the claims. https://web.archive.org/save/https://mariegoldsmith.files.wordpress.com/2023/07/soren-hough-marie-goldsmith-scientific-luminary-anarchist-militant-2.pdf131.111.84.206 (talk) 14:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per above, we can't cite that source directly but can potentially use its references if they point to reliable, secondary sources. For the case of the birth date, that is original research analyzed between primary sources, so we need an independently verified scholarly source to make that determination, i.e., a piece like this one published in a vetted journal. Because ostensibly the Black Flag Anarchist Review is not performing a peer review of the material prior to publication. czar12:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Czar, thanks for that feedback. I can say the piece was reviewed by two historical scholars (entirely external to the project) prior to publication even though that is not Black Flag's policy. As to vetting beyond this step, I'm not sure what per se can be done - just wanted to flag in general that this article does have a number of clear mistakes going off of primary sources (government documents, university degrees, etc.). For instance, the idea that Goldsmith was Jewish seems to have been a supposition in the English record based on her name and the fact that she wrote frequently for Yiddish journals. Of note, there don't appear to be any Russian-language texts that even make this claim, much less source it. 131.111.84.111 (talk) 14:35, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know Hough, the author of the Black Flag piece?[5][6] And do you know why the peer review wasn't included in that Hough Black Flag article PDF?
The current Wikipedia article doesn't use primary sources itself. The claims about Jewish background and birth year all come from secondary sources. Those authors might themselves cite primary sources as is their prerogative as academics. We're relying on the secondary source authors and their publications to vet their claims. They might be wrong, but we're outsourcing to their expertise rather than making it up ourselves as Wikipedia editors. Are there no other reliable sources that back up Hough's revisions/scholarship? czar15:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To answer the first question, yes. As I noted, this "peer review" was informal hence not being included in the article. I don't think it would be appropriate to refer to the article as peer reviewed; the point was more for general interest that scholars did, indeed, review the piece before it was published at the request of the author.
I completely agree that the Wikipedia article cites secondary sources. My point was that the secondary sources do not back this up in primary sources because there aren't any (that I'm aware of) that support many of the claims. They seem to only reference other secondary sources or nothing at all (i.e. Falk doesn't seem to cite anyone for the year of birth). I might add that Falk uses the birth year 1873, which is much closer to the actual year of 1871.
Unfortunately, the Black Flag article was written in part to correct the record on a lot of the misinformation out there about Goldsmith that's been repeated in secondary sources (both academic and non-academic), so there probably aren't corroborating sources beyond the primary sources cited in that article. I do know that the articles and biography from the MG Project will eventually be published by PM Press (who also put up a blog version of this same biographical article: https://blog.pmpress.org/2023/07/19/marie-goldsmith-scientific-luminary-anarchist-militant/) in a series of books, but that's likely a few years out.
Totally understand the policy at Wikipedia - just wanted to flag this for the record, and note that even if the Black Flag article doesn't end up being cited as a source/its info isn't used, the Wikipedia article itself cites sources which, in turn, often do not cite any primary sources to back up their claims. That said, I get that that Wikipedia editors can't really fact-check articles in that way. 131.111.84.206 (talk) 17:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
