Talk:MVP

MVP

The hockey card company, MVP.

Sebian band

The sebian band MVP should be mentioned. https://www.facebook.com/Meet.the.Serbs/posts/302887979818728

Ahlabonde (talk) 12:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:MVP (Mister V album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 July 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. There is consensus to move for now based on the lack of a clear primary topic, albeit with some uncertainty that could give reason for reconsideration relatively soon. (non-admin closure) {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MVP (disambiguation) → MVP – No primary topic for this three-letter acronym, between Most valuable player (the current redirect target), Minimum viable product, and others. See page views: [1] (comparing a few topics: Most valuable player, Minimum viable product, Montel Vontavious Porter, Mitral valve prolapse, Model–view–presenter) or [2] (massviews). Adumbrativus (talk) 06:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Google search brought up equivalent results for minimum viable product and most valuable player. I believe those two are equivalent primary topics and should be mentioned at the top of the DAB page. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:40, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=Most_valuable_player doesn't show a lot of clicks on the hatnote, but with only 189 it's already #2 most commonly clicked link there (May '23), so it makes sense to try disambiguating, and later see if navigation outcomes have improved. --Joy (talk) 14:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose. I don't have a lot of data to back up this claim, but I don't think minimum viable product is really as common a term as most valuable player. DuckDuckGo almost solely focused on the sports coverage (archive) rather than the marketing term. That's all I got though since I don't know how else I could make the case for sportsball here. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

followup to move

https://wikinav.toolforge.org/?language=en&title=MVP indicates that in September '23, there were a total of 1.9k incoming views, which led to 679 outgoing views, to 7 destinations, where most valuable player got 262, minimum viable product got 179, Montel Vontavious Porter got 172, and a few other smaller ones. --Joy (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In October '23 it was 1.9k incoming, 730 identified outgoing, to 8 destinations, of which 277 to player, 209 to product, 154 to Porter, etc. --Joy (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]