This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 28, 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
That would make more sense to me too. I think it was made that way to correspond to the table in the article; should that be changed too? Is there a requirement to start at the city center and move outward for these types of articles? --Esprqii (talk) 23:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Quick question about the planning process for the Yellow Line: was an alternative in the Interstate 5 right-of-way proposed during the EIS process? The FTA's Annual Report on Funding Recommendation for 2005 seems to show an I-5 alignment (p. 79), but I think it could be a simple mapping error on their part. SounderBruce22:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's wrong. The I-5 alignment was considered during studies for the second or third iteration of the South–North project (which both failed). The Interstate MAX project chose Interstate Avenue from the get go. --Truflip99 (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
While looking for something else, I came across published info. giving the Yellow Line's full length – including the section that had already existed for the Blue and Red Lines – when it opened, in 2004. But for now, I have not added it to the article, since it differs from the line's current overall length, following its 2009 route change that move it onto the Portland Transit Mall. The source[1] gives an overall length of 11.6 km (7.2 miles), "of which" (sources states) 9.3 km (5.8 miles) was "new construction". SJ Morg (talk) 02:58, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
