Talk:London Underground anagram map

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

I remvoed the level 2 heading for blogging because it was only one paragraph long, so it can join the previous section. RJFJR 14:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cognate anagrams

Nothing in this section seems very encyclopaedic to me - I have already removed a blatantly attenuated assocation of "gay cruising" with the anagram "hate shamed path" for Hampstead Heath, but I am probably going to remove the rest unless any of it can be cited - at the moment it is nothing more than POV. Any thoughts? Peeper 00:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The cognate anagrams were intended and identified as such on the Thingbox thread. Whether they were unintentional or not does not change their cognate nature.Barryheck 22:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response - Unfortunately I think it falls foul of WP:NOR. I have put in a request for a citation, so please add one. Without it, it doesn't fit well here. (Also, please do remember to sign all posts with four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end.) Thanks. Peeper 20:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The thread was discussed on Thingbox here: http://www.thingbox.com/forums/thread/11000/1. Although citation is irrelevant as an anagram's cognate nature does not depend on the author's intention but the reader's interpretation. For example; Concerning Torments would only be cognate to people knowledgable of the Mornington Crescent game. Others may spot an apparent cognate meaning in another anagram that the author had not intended.Barryheck 22:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, there was a link to Thingbox previously but it was removed as the site needed registration. Wouldn't the citation encounter the same problem?Barryheck 23:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on London Underground anagram map. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]