Talk:List of village development committees of Nepal

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nepal

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of village development committees of Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012163506/http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1 to http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/nepalcensus/form.php?selection=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English version of PDF file

Excuse me, but according to this link:[1] is there an English version of this PDF file? [2] jlog3000 (talk) 01:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No there is not any. We are working on that translation Draft:List of Gaupalika Bishal Shrestha (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand totally. However, I will look forward to it. Thanks. jlog3000 (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing Renaming of this page

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I strongly Oppose the rename that was made to this page from List of village development committees of Nepal to List of Rural Municipalities in Nepal. Renaming the page and editing this VDC page into Rural Municipality will make the data and VDC list disappear. Draft:List of Gaupalika is being worked on for some time now and this can be a better option, rather than renaming this page. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-one is stopping you miving it back. Or you can have a proper discussion on the article name by using the method at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_a_single_page_move Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bishal Shrestha, I too oppose the move. 92.227.34.163 (talk) 10:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Rural Municipalities in Nepal → List of village development committees of Nepal – The page was moved(1) without any discussion previously in talk page or Move discussion page. I strongly oppose and can not undo this change due to Wikipedia policies. This page should be renamed back to its original name and content be restored to the previous unscrambled version 2. The Draft:List of Gaupalika is being worked on and it can be served as a separate article rather than renaming the list of VDCs. This list of VDCs can serve as a historical evidence rather than renaming and modifiying the VDCs into Rural Municipality and it can also serve as a reference in making of Rural Municipalities page. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 15:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The individual pages for the VDCs are historical evidence in itself. VDCs were renamed Rural Municipalities and serve the same purpose. If you do think that a page for listing old VDCs are needed, the page Village Development Committee should be used instead. User:Dirghayu12 (talk) 22:46, 12 June 2017 (NST)

Move to lowercase, "rural municipalities" is the official term per the citation given ( https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/gaunpalikas-called-rural-municipalities/ ). – Fayenatic London 21:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Fayenatic london, this should be speedily reverted as the move from List of village development committees of Nepal to List of rural municipalities in Nepal was only done recently, and was opposed. 92.227.34.163 (talk) 10:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dirghayu12:, The Village Development Committee page is a descriptive article and listing the existing VDCs is a bad idea on it. The List of village development committees of Nepal should exist to maintain the record of VDCs and a new page should be created for list of Gaupalika/Rural Municipalities. @Fayenatic london:, would you mind stepping in? Bishal Shrestha (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that List of village development committees of Nepal page should exist I don't have any opposition. But I do think that having a list of VDC's in the page Village Development Committee would make sense since they don't exist anymore. User:Dirghayu12 (talk) 18:52, 13 June 2017 (NST)

I can understand your concern. However, the page will be much long and that is a reason the list was created. I hope you got where I am going Bishal Shrestha (talk) 13:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Appleyard: - can you please intervene and speedily restore the version that existed before the undiscussed contested move? The should be a page for VDC, List of VDCs, and of course for the new units. But hijacking VDC and turning into a new topic is highly controversial. The controversial contested move shall be undone. Thanks to Bishal Shrestha for bringing the attention to the case. 77.180.60.142 (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishal Shrestha: In the history of page List of rural municipalities in Nepal, please tell me which edits you want me to split the history at, and where you want me to move each section of its edit history to. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: You can restore the page to a revision to this revision (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_rural_municipalities_in_Nepal&oldid=782359681). All the previous edits can be ignored and splitted to. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Anthony Appleyard and Bishal Shrestha: maybe this version is better: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_rural_municipalities_in_Nepal&oldid=625484151 because afterwards a user stepped in an introduced municipalities. 78.51.247.123 (talk) 15:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Bishal Shrestha: Here is the diff from 14 September 2014 to 12 June 2015 [3] , are these the old VDCs and old municipalities? 78.51.247.123 (talk) 16:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - I didn't notice that the pages were edited to match the new structure of rural municipality before too. As per the record, the Rural Municipality was announced on March 10, 2017 (Source cited in Gaupalika). All the changes made after the date can be reversed and [4] this version as of 1 February 2017 can be used as a restore point. The edits made after the announcement of Rural Municipality makes no sense howsoever. @78.51.247.123: That revision is fine as it is made for change in Municipality, not Rural Municipality and was before Gaupalika/Rural Municipality was announced. @Anthony Appleyard:, do ignore my previous suggestion for restore point, and do use this one Bishal Shrestha (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Bishal Shrestha, thank you! Sorting out old municipalities and old VDCs will be another topic then. 78.51.247.123 (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - That will be great. Am working on Draft:List of Gaupalika at the moment. It would be great if some reviewer could review it and get it live. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 16:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        @Anthony Appleyard and Bishal Shrestha: I see user:Dirghayu12 removed the municipalities, so maybe the current version is good for VDC. That means: No split please! Anthony, please just speedily move back, as per original request to undo the contested move. 78.51.247.123 (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        I still think that there is a need for splitting. It's not just the edits made by him, but by a lot of people throughout the course after Rural Municipalities has been announced. [5] can explain the changes in comparision. A specific comparision can be noticed in Kathmandu section which contains list of Municipalities, the change which were brought after the Rural municipality and new municipality were brought into effect. Bishal Shrestha (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        Bishal Shrestha, but if only parts are affected, then a history split would also bring VDC content to another page. The rural municipality data can be copied manually, no history split. @Anthony Appleyard: please just revert as suggested by WP policies - revert contested move. 77.180.228.126 (talk) 18:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Bishal Shrestha: Do you want me to move List of rural municipalities in Nepal to List of village development committees of Nepal? Or what? If you want me to revert, please give the date and time and editor of the edit that you want me to split at or to revert to. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:16, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Anthony Appleyard:, pls just move back, speedy revert of contested move. Anything else can be done afterwards. 77.180.228.126 (talk) 20:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.