Talk:To Heart 2

To Heart 2 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 15, 2012	Peer review	Not reviewed
March 17, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Video games: Visual novels Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

First header

The spacing of ToHeart2 should really be "ToHeart2" instead of "To Heart2" or other variations. Virtually all the Japanese sites use it, including the official website on Aquaplus. (http://www.aquaplus.co.jp/th2/index.html) The same would apply to ToHeart.

I vote that we maintain the spacing convention shown by the creators, just for accuracy's sake.

Karn-b 18:30, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Squilibob's split

~~Squilibob deleted a bit too much. I don't have time too fix that right now though. Shinobu 12:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

He moved it to a separate "game" article. That cought me by surprise, hence the remark above. Shinobu 16:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We decided to split the articles up into several smaller articles and expand them separately. --Squilibob 08:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed up some stuff

I did a kinda big edit, although really changing minor grammer errors, spellings, and re-wording some stuff as it didn't fit or make a lot of sense. I saw there were some text that might of just been copied from the Japanese wiki page on this game so I worked on that. Tell me if I messed up- thanks. 24.129.239.143 06:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:To-heart-logo-comparison.jpg

Image:To-heart-logo-comparison.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:To Heart 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Demize (talk · contribs) 01:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: As the majority of the references used appear to be Japanese, this review will mostly look at the other aspects of the article. I'll try to be harder on them than I normally would, and I will also converse with the nominator about the references if I feel it's necessary. demize (t · c) 01:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Review

There were some issues that I discussed with Cloud668, the nominator and the major contributor to the article, on IRC (Rizon). Logs can be provided if anybody wants them.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good article overall.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
A lot of listing of things, but this is due to the content rather than the writing. Also, I ran AWB on this for genfixes/typos and none were found.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
All the sources appear to be good: there are a couple well-known magazines; the publisher's and developer's websites; and Anime News Network, a well-known English source of information on the topics of Anime and Japanese Video games.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
While there could be more screenshots, they are not necessary and likely would not add much to the article.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I do believe that this article meets the Good Article standards. Congratulations! demize (t · c) 03:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! -- クラウド６６８ 04:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]