Talk:List of Atlus games

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of Minecraft characters (4 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (4 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants)
TheoTown (12 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

New list

Brandnew list made by Sillent DX (talk).

The old list: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_Atlus_games&diff=454828898&oldid=452383364 ... If some game from the old list is not included in the new list, just add it. --Hydao (talk) 14:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Protected article request

Can we protect this article from anonymous IPs? Just look at all the edits that have had to be reverted over the last few months. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I see no reason why List of Atlus games and List of Atlus downloadable games should be separate; a downloadable game is still a game and it is unnecessary to make a distinction based upon the distribution. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 07:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of that article anyway, I just see a lot of redundancy. I vote for just redirecting that article here. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 11:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merging or redirecting. @Soetermans: I would bold go ahead and do this as no one seems to have contested it in months. --The1337gamer (talk) 14:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree too. The table format seems to be identical enough so I don't see any issues with the merge. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - What I propose is the entire article to be condensed to simply a list of games, with the platforms as a separate field, like this. Having it separated by platform is highly redundant and hard to navigate. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 16:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Dissident93, I honestly think you should go ahead with the merger of List of Atlus games and List of Atlus downloadable games as soon as you can. Nobody's against it, and the execution is in limbo right now. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 20:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'm aware, but I think the article would be better as a list of games by release date, rather than platform. See List of Square Enix games for how this would ideally work. The only issue is that it would require a large amount of work, so I haven't really got around to it yet. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say merge them. It would be easier and there isn't much of a point in having them in separate articles. Namcokid47 (talk) 22:49, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The only thing stopping anybody, including me, is the large amount of tedious work it would take to do it. If anybody gets around to doing it before myself, use the PlatinumGames' article worklist as the foundation. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 03:33, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Soetermans, The1337gamer, Iftekharahmed96, and Namcokid47: I did the merger on my sandbox page, but before I merge it back to the main page, I have questions.

Should Atlus's in-house developed games be included with games they only published, like List of Square Enix video games, or should they be separated into their own table?
Should we group by year, or keep the exact release date? Exact release dates for some of these more obscure games are almost impossible to find, but generally the year is known.
Should we keep the regional release info? Like above, some games might have been released in Australia, but it's a no here because it wasn't really reported.

Other than that, it just needs all the repeated games removed, more references, and a platform field, which is probably the hardest part as it can't be automated like all the previous edits. If anybody wants to help, go ahead, but I should get around to it over time. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 22:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure since I really don't know anything about Atlus. Good work though, lemme know what everyone else thinks. Namcokid47 (talk) 23:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is really good formatting, thanks for the hard work. Personally, I don't think that games published solely by Atlus USA should be on this list. I created the table for that on the Atlus USA page. Everything on that page should be games that have been published by Atlus because they own all the intellectual properties that they publish. Games solely published by Atlus USA on the other hand are just distribution agreements. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 11:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I was going to do that anyway. As for an update, I'll probably end up removing the regional release data and merge release dates by year instead of day if nobody objects, as it's just easier and cleaner to maintain. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 08:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in agreement for release dates by year. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way serge, you can go ahead with the manual merging of the Atlus games articles. There doesn't seem to be any other feedback outside of mines. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 17:13, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone, I'm okay with investing some time in this project. Looking at the current draft in User:Dissident93's sandbox, I think the biggest chunk of work is adding a Platform column. I don't mind fixing that. I personally prefer to keep the exact dates in the 'original release date' column for a clearer overview. TheLegendaryN (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's the current situation of the merge? I think the merge should be implemented now. As mentioned earlier, all games published solely by Atlus USA is going to be on their page regardless if it's physical or digital (as they're a separate legal entity despite being a regional division). Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have something on my sandbox page, which is based on Dissident's version on his sandbox page back in January (see my message above). So I got it merged, I think it's complete and clear of duplicates, but it's not sorted on release date. TheLegendaryN (talk) 23:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once the dates get sorted, it should go live. That's the only thing that kept me from finishing it, as it's such a large amount of manual work. EDIT: Oh, and there still exists some redundant games that should be merged, but that should be done after the dates. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 23:34, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time for it today, but I have sorted the dates using the dts feature, so I can write a small program to sort the whole table. I will have to manually restore all Japanese references then (any reference with non-Unicode characters), but I think that's less work then manually sorting the whole table by date. I think I can have that done in a couple of days. TheLegendaryN (talk) 09:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing is sorted and can be found on my sandbox page (link above). I still need to fix the references that contain Japanese (non-Unicode) characters. Once I'm finished with that, I'll put everything up in this article. TheLegendaryN (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. I'll fix any remaining issues with it once it's live. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 19:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the names and references with non-Unicode characters. I've set the whole thing live. :D TheLegendaryN (talk) 23:03, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only real thing left to do is replace the GameSpot profile pages (which are supposed to be unreliable), with third-party articles. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 23:44, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P-Studio

I noticed that Studio Zero is listed as the developer for their games (Catherine: Full Body & Project Re Fantasy) since they were established, instead of Atlus. I was wondering if the same should be done for P-Studio's games since they were officially established in 2012. The P-Studio logo appears on the back of the boxes on these games:

Persona 4 Golden
Persona 4 Arena
Persona 4 Arena Ultimax
Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth
Persona 4: Dancing All Night
Persona 5
Persona 3: Dancing in Moonlight
Persona 5: Dancing in Starlight
Persona Q2: New Cinema Labyrinth

And will presumably be on Persona 5 Royal and Scramble as well. Thoughts? TheHumanIntersect (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they should have P-Studio listed. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 18:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"(Redirected from Neo Steam: The Shattered Continent)"

Do you love this BS as much as I do? No mention of said game to be seen. Ah, Wikipedia, stay <censored>. jae (talk) 00:50, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]