Talk:Leviathan (1989 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leviathan (1989 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Italian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Could "Deep Rising" be another movie with a similar theme? I never saw it so I can;t comment on it.24.83.178.11 10:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)BeeCier[reply]

Removed plot tag

I have removed the plot tag again. In addition to the

Infobox
Lede section
Plot section
Cast section
Soundtrack section
Reception section
References section
External links section
Navigation box

I have added

Production section
Release section
Home media section
Critical response section
Audience response section

Therefore, I no longer believe that the article "consists almost entirely of a plot summary". Accordingly, I have removed the {{all plot}} tag. Cheers. 64.40.54.177 (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if "Matt Roehler" added his "audience opinion" himself, but he's not a noteworthy person. One YouTube user's video (with a whopping 800 views) does not warrant its own section. Audience Response section removed 86.3.217.7 (talk) 22:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doniago

I notice you do a lot of reverting of edits; lots of aggressive slashing-and-burning. You reversed all of my edits on this page with a dismissive comment: " Reverted edits by PumpkinButter (talk) to last version by Ser Amantio di Nicolao please don't link common terms"

Common to whom? To people who don't speak English? They use wikipedia too. Young students/kids who are still learning? They use wikipedia too.

If I stand outside on Main Street and ask the first 10 people who go by, to define "geologist"--I doubt even one could. Perhaps you live in a highly-educated area, but keep in mind that only 37% of Americans have a college degree, and public schools often leave a lot to be desired.

You believe the term Soviet is "common"? You realize the Soviet Union dissolved 35 years ago, and a whole generation of ppl know very little about it? (When you bring the subject up in a classroom, how many seem to have a single clue?)

Sick bay is properly 2 words, not one, but you reverted that too--why? You prefer the incorrect version?

You think people outside of USA are familiar with the US Coast Guard and know its part of the US military? You think regular people can define exactly what DNA is?

I consider your edit a rather hostile action and not sure why you did it? You couldn't go thru and just remove one or two terms?

I do not engage in edit wars/pissing contests, but felt I should reply to your dismissive comment.

Please do not use reverts as weapons. And Sick bay is 2 words, not one... since you authoritatively claim its a "common term"--it seems you should already know this. PB57 (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think MOS:OL covers this better than any response I might have to offer, for the most part. The number of edits you made were extensive, and I think people generally are familiar with the concepts of things such as the US military and DNA.

Please assume good faith rather than accusing other editors of reverting as weapons. Feel free to reinsert your "sick bay" change; sometimes editors make mistakes...including you.

Also, please note that new threads should generally be placed at the bottom of Talk pages. DonIago (talk) 20:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your reply. Yes, I will replace Sick Bay, Dr McCoy would want us to get it right. PB57 (talk) 21:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]