Talk:Lethal Enforcers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Lethal Enforcers 3

Possibly the reason Lethal Enforcers 3 is so different from the others is that it's not actually from the same series -- the original Japanese titles are different. Presumably the name was changed because a) Heroes of Justice is not a very good title b) Lethal Enforcers has more name recognition. I'd rather defer to others as to how this information ought to be worked into the article. Casey J. Morris (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?

The game is included in the category of "Controversial games" and yet there is absolutely nothing about said controversy in the article. The entire article works more like a how-to guide on the game than anything else. What's going on here? 69.241.141.42 07:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm writing a paper on video game controversy, and this article mentions nothing about how this game was controversial. Perhaps this could somehow be worked somewhere into the article? Joe D 13:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found it - there was a little statement in "trivia". I'm asking for a citation as the only thing I could find was a single entry in a ~1994 handout that ignores the fact that shooting first without checking your target will cause you to lose the game. --Sigma 7 03:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the page on the Justifier the Justifier and Lethal Enforcers were used as examples in Congressional hearings about violent video games Casey J. Morris (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam?

I was just wondering why the review of this game from Screwattack has been removed. Screwattack are an established UK video game website (also original home of the Angry Video Game Nerd) and I thought a review of said game would be relevant, but it has been classed as linkspam. Can anyone clarify why?

Before anyone asks, I am nothing to do with Screwattack, I tried to do a website once and it sucked!

Cheers

Eugenespeed (talk) 11:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is from 2008 and you've not been editing much recently, but I have removed that link. The reason is, it doesn't exist anymore.

It just sends you to the Gametrailers You Tube Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.248.20 (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lethal Enforcers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515020254/http://laist.com/2008/05/08/laist_interview_143.php to http://laist.com/2008/05/08/laist_interview_143.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]