Talk:Lego Overwatch

Lego Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gameplay of Pokémon (4 participants)
Lisette Titre-Montgomery (4 participants)
Party royale game (3 participants)
List of Minecraft characters (7 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (5 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants; relisted)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Character summaries

Hello Striker 2020, I have trimmed down the first two character summaries. Do you want to take a look at them and if you think they are ok, I will do the rest. Fieryninja (talk) 06:43, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK I went ahead and did the rest of the summaries. I think I have done all I can with them as I'm not familiar with the characters or the story. Fieryninja (talk) 07:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Fieryninja. I have a question what happen if they cannot merge will they remove the tag or not? Striker2020 (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome Striker 2020. I don't know what happens about the merge tag. I suggest that you ask for help from an admin for advice by asking the question on The Teahouse forum. Best wishes Fieryninja (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fieryninja I found 3 source pages [1][2][3] from the Brick Fanatics and added new development sections. Will that be Ok? Striker2020 (talk) 05:41, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like an improvement and the quotes give some good background information about the development. You might want to look for other media sources as back up though. Fieryninja (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fieryninja I'm thinking if I make this page look better so that no need to merged. According to Brick Fanatics website it said that the new sets might coming this year and I hope it can be true. Striker2020 (talk) 07:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think if you have added more content the it might be enough to justify keeping this page. Take a look at wikipedia:Merging to see the process. The discussion for this merge took place in February and no consensus seems to have been reached so perhaps this merge no longer needs to go ahead. But I'm not sure if you can close the merge. Fieryninja (talk) 07:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good news and bad news

Hi Fieryninja, I found 3 editors from Talk:Overwatch (video game) and they said no need merge but the admin is still insist of merge. I already improved my page should be ok by now. Is there anyway you can help me? Striker2020 (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Striker2020 I'm not sure what you can do other than contact the admin and discuss it. Maybe say you have expanded the page and ask for an opinion? I'm not really clear about the process sorry. Fieryninja (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned user draft

Please would an interested editor assess the earlier draft at User:Oon835/sandbox 7, merge anything worthwhile into the live article, blank the user page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 11:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]