Talk:Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Led Zeppelin Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Led Zeppelin, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Led Zeppelin-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the members page, to join the project.Led ZeppelinWikipedia:WikiProject Led ZeppelinTemplate:WikiProject Led ZeppelinLed Zeppelin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Remaster

Is this a third remastering? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWantedFan69 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection. Jenks24 (talk) 08:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitive Collection Mini LP Replica CD Boxset → Definitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs (Led Zeppelin boxed set) – consistent with album packaging; includes band's name in article title. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC) Radiopathy •talk• 16:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support addition of Led Zeppellin - or Support any alternative variant including the most important bit of information - a good example of how generic media format description titles consistently fail users on en.wp. Here the only actual title is "Definitive Collection" (which is a dab) wheras Mini LP Replica CD and Boxset are format descriptors. Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection (Mini LP Replica CD Boxset) might be a better [Title (format)] solution. But it really doesn't matter, any solution which includes the most important bit of information is helpful, and any solution which hides the most important bit of information is failing to recognize the difference between a thing/place/person article and an artist's product for the WP:AT "general reader". In ictu oculi (talk) 23:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as proposed Definitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs (Led Zeppelin) would seem to be the correct disambiguation. This also avoids the mess currently occurring at talk:Box set where the nominator has requested it be renamed to "boxed set" -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 07:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Definitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs. The (Led Zeppelin boxed set) (which of course, should be box set, per this, and many other sources) is only needed if there was another article titled Definitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I proposed the term "boxed set" to maintain consistency across Led Zeppelin articles, e.g., this and this. I won't endorse the IPs otherwise acceptable proposal of Definitive Collection of Mini-LP Replica CDs (Led Zeppelin) nor User:Lugnutss proposal because they are the result of WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT and WP:WIKIHOUNDING rather than any type of policy-based reasoning, based on the discussion here. Radiopathy •talk• 17:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ironic you state I have a non-policy based rationale, when that's exactly what you have in your other move request. Again, WP:CIR on your part. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering your opinions at the Box Set move request, it seems you're the one with issues about IDONTLIKEIT. It has clearly been shown to you at that discussion that "box set" is acceptable English even appearing in Oxford dictionaries. Considering that this nomination and the box set's nomination occur on the same day, it would appear the two are related. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 04:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. It's not down to the nom to "endorse" other user's comments. The closing admin will do so. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Lugnuts old chap, there's a lot of Definitive Collections. What if readers know the band but don't know the exact format? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, interesting! Happy to go for Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection then. Ramble On, everybody. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:59, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection would be the most user friendly result. I realise that would make the article a bit too easy to find but it is what Amazon.com has. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I agree that would be the most logical solution, even though amazon is far from being a reliable source. Radiopathy •talk• 01:39, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

However your suggested title already redirects to this page; I think my suggestion is more precise, since it is, outside the parentheses, how the collection is described on the package. Radiopathy •talk• 17:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't think that Led Zeppellin Definitive Collection would be less of a mouthful/easier to type? Anyway, I support the original RM as well. Any result that leads to the band's name being added would meet WP:SONGDAB vs the dozens of other Definitive Collection. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Led Zeppelin Definitive Collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130405161456/http://www.billboard.com/artist/306805/led+zeppelin/chart to http://www.billboard.com/artist/306805/led+zeppelin/chart

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]