Talk:Las Vegas culture (archaeology)

Ecuador Mid‑importance

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas Mid‑importance

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 18 February 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Las Vegas culture. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Name

Would be nice if someone could add a paragraph explaining how it came to be known as the "Las Vegas" culture, far removed as it is from anything else named Las Vegas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikeus (talk • contribs) 17:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both are from Spanish las vegas, "(the) meadows". --90.200.48.95 (talk) 12:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

Why does this page have the disamiguator (archaeology) when "Las Vegas culture" redirects here ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist🩸 (talk) 12:58, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas culture (archaeology) → Las Vegas culture – Las Vegas culture already redirects to the archeological article, so it has an unnecessary disambiguation. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 09:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 11:33, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Clearly not the primary topic - Las Vegas culture should redirect to Las Vegas#Culture instead. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:53, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per Pppery, precisely, perfect page placement! Las Vegas culture should redirect to Las Vegas#Culture as the topic most readers would search for with that wording. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As the largest contributor to this article, I agree with the two posters above. The problem seems to be solved. Smallchief (talk) 17:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an established term in archaeology and I think the hatnote is sufficient for any users looking for the culture of the US city. Rafts of Calm (talk) 22:53, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Las Vegas culture should redirect to Las Vegas#Culture. cookie monster 755 10:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.