Talk:Knightmare (1986 video game)

Knightmare (1986 video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 28, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Renaming

Any reason as to why this was renamed to Knightmare video game? Marminnetje 16:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So it wouldn't be confused with the article for the televison series of the same name--Fantastic fred (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese exclusive?

This game is categorised as being exclusive to Japan, at least officially, but I had the game in Britain. Having said that, I don't know where it was obtained from originally because we got it second hand. I'm also not sure if MSX games were locked by region. Probably not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.132.105 (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had this in Finland, and it came with English instructions and box. So I'm sure it must've been released in Europe. Besides, the Japanese name is Majou Densetsu. So where would the name Knightmare come from if it didn't have Western release...? --94.22.135.152 (talk) 11:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- And Giant Bomb mentions that "The manual for the English release had a considerably embellished plot". So yeah, this wasn't Japan exclusive. --94.22.135.152 (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

game designers and directors

Would be interesting if someone could find the designers and directors involved on this game development, since it's very remarkable and innovative in the game development history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitrofurano (talk • contribs) 17:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Knightmare msx screens 1.GIF

Image:Knightmare msx screens 1.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Knightmare (1986 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 19:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'll pick up this review. If I'm not back by this time next week with comments and such, please ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KGRAMR: I can't see anything here that needs correcting or altering. Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ProtoDrake:Well, i certainly wasn't expecting an instant pass on my second GA nomination. Anyways, thanks for taking the time to review the article! I have another one in the waiting line so if you're interested in reviewing that one as well, let me know and i'll get around to it. Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]