Talk:King's Road Chelsea railway station

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations / in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Crossrail 2

The creation of this article seems to have caused quite a bit of controversy. It is understandable that people are concerned that this is jumping the gun a bit, as this line has been on the drawing board for more than a century and is currently not planned to begin construction before the likely completion date of Crossrail 1 in 2017. However, surely its wikipedia's role to inform readers of this safeguarded route, as long as it is made clear that this is a proposed line, being developed by Crossrail and Transport for London. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.195.96 (talk • contribs)

This article contains little that is not contained in Chelsea-Hackney line, essentially this is a copy/fork. MRSC • Talk 11:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In essence I would agree with you, however I believe it is beneficial to retain an individual article about every extant / proposed tube station for the benefit of readers and editors when linking. --AlisonW (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can agree with that for something that has detailed plans and/or funded. However, this station doesn't appear to even have an agreed location. A redirect will provide the necessary linkage to the information. MRSC • Talk 14:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Tube' station

Given that it now appears extremely likely that the Crossrail 2 will be built to mainline rail standards, rather than Tube, ought this article to be renamed? Chelsea railway station would be most appropriate I think, though this is currently a disambig page. Grunners (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I've moved the article to Chelsea (Crossrail 2) railway station: if it ever gets built, it will probably become the primary topic and can be moved to the current home of the disambiguation page. --RFBailey (talk) 23:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is a year late but I disagree that this would be the primary topic as it is no more notable than the station in Melbourne. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 18:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates and the open streetmap image

Whilst the coordinates are currently correct, the location it shows on the Open Streetmap image is wrong. Is there any way to correct this? Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 9 years 18:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on King's Road Chelsea railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070614105958/http://www.dft.gov.uk/162259/165220/220115/070402electronicconsultatio1.pdf to http://www.dft.gov.uk/162259/165220/220115/070402electronicconsultatio1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station scheme scapped

A recent edit altered the article to suggest that the King's Road Chelsea station project had been scrapped. This was based on one single, slightly sensationalist news article. I can find no other evidence that the Chelsea station has been cancelled, and indeed it is still included in official TfL publicity. While the station's future may in doubt, to state that it has been cancelled is misleading, so I have removed this suggestion from the article. As per WP:CRYSTAL, please do not add claims that it has been cancelled until an official announcement from TfL confirms this. Cnbrb (talk) 13:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is incorrect

Image displays South Kensington and Gloucester Road the wrong way round 137.222.229.10 (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]