Talk:Kenny Ho
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested moves
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
– Currently the stylist is the primary topic and (despite that) gets less than 1/6 the traffic of the actor. It should be the other way around, i.e. the actor should be the primary topic. Timmyshin (talk) 08:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Oppose first move, support the second. I'm not seeing a primary topic at all: Kenny Ho should be converted into a disambiguation page after the second move occurs. Steel1943 (talk) 15:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Now neutral per below. Steel1943 (talk) 19:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think it is a primary topic because with respect to usage, the actor gets around 1000 hits per month, the stylist/primary page around 160 per month. That's 86% of Kenny Ho's usage for the actor, and it goes without saying that if you move the stylist to Kenny Ho (stylist) this percentage would be even higher. WP:PRIMARYTOPIC: "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." I think the actor's page meets the criteria. Timmyshin (talk) 16:42, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- The "rule of thumb" I have seen in the past (that I eventually adopted) is that a primary topic can be declared if it has 10 times as many page views of all of the other examples of articles with the same name combined. The primary topic proposed here has not met that criteria. Steel1943 (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Not applicable to a WP:TWODABS situation, see my comment below. bd2412 T 18:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Support as proposed; per WP:TWODABS, no disambiguation page should be made here, because additional navigational assistance is not required if the navigation can be provided in a hatnote. A disambiguation page is only a navigational device, and should not be created where navigation can be accomplished short of the inconvenience to readers caused by sending them to a page that does not contain what they are likely to be searching for. Please avoid making two-link disambiguation pages unless there is a clear absence of a primary topic. bd2412 T 18:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Unknown-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Unknown-importance
- Stub-Class Chinese-language entertainment articles
- Unknown-importance Chinese-language entertainment articles
- WikiProject Chinese-language entertainment articles
- Automatically assessed China-related articles
- WikiProject China articles