Talk:Kamakshi Ambal Temple
This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Joshua Jonathan (talk · contribs) on 7 April 2024. |
This non-existent page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Where does this article come from
[edit]@Doug Weller, RegentsPark, and Utcursch: does one of you understand how a user who's made only ten edits can create such a long article out of nowhere? May it have been deleted before? Copied from somewhere else? Note also this line from the first version link:
In the Sangam text Perumpanatruppadai, the temple has been mentioned as Kamavelkottam along with Kumarakottam, which was then ruled by the Sangam-era King Thondaiman Ilandiraiyan.[citation needed]
"citation needed" is not what you expect someone to add to their first draft. Also odd are the dates in this tag: {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} {{Use Indian English|date=July 2020}} And why does another new user submit it (also) diff? - Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
It's a copy from Kamakshi Amman Temple, right? My... Which User:Carnaticnerd edited from 5-7 april diff, trying to change the name from "Sri Kamakshi Amman Temple" to "Sri Kamakshi Ambal Temple." Also ping User:Theroadislong, who moved this (Ambal) article to mainspace. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 08:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshua Jonathan@RegentsParkUser:Utcursch Deleted, but left this talk page, should we use the real article's talk page to note this? Doug Weller talk 11:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
And why was it submitted by another editor?
[edit]User talk:Sumer Singh Jaipur#Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamakshi Ambal Temple has been accepted Doug Weller talk 11:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)