Talk:KLIA Ekspres

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KLIA Ekspres article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Malaysia Mid‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:KLIA Ekspres Line.

Edited

I've edited most of the page to improve content presentation and also somewhat Wikified the article. Please comment. Thanks. --Pavithran 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that the KLIA Ekspress is not a High-speed rail. High-Speed rails are train transport in excess of 200km/h. Both the KLIA Ekspress and KLIA Transit does not ecxeed that limit. --Pavithran 18:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With so many flights arriving into KLIA in the early hours of the morning, it would be nice to be able to see what times the KLIA Express commences its service. I have scoured the internet and google and have been unable to establish if it will be running when i arrive at 5.45am. --(Stuart Rowley - Melbourne) 12.03, 02/01/07

First train as at 5.00 AM and if I am not mistaken, it is on 20 min interval. I can't check KLIA Ekspres website possibly due to Taiwan earthquake's cabling problem. I am sure you will be able to catch the train when you arrive in KLIA at that designated time. THank you --Zack2007 02:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KLIA ekspres logo.png

Image:KLIA ekspres logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KLIA ekspres logo.png

Image:KLIA ekspres logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Profitability

There is no way in hell KLIA Ekspres can be profitable after the first year. Average daily ridership in 2002 was under 5000 x RM 35 x 365 days = RM 64 million in tickets sold. The project cost RM2.4 billion to build, which at 5% would require RM 120 in yearly interest paymants alone.

Perhaps the article means to say it's operationally profitable (that is, before interest), but I'd like to see a source even for that. Jpatokal 05:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't yet have a reference for the statement. My source was the Malaysian Wikipedia article on KLIA Ekspress. I'll try to get a more authoritative source for this information soon.--Pavithran (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IntegratedRailTransitIcon.png

Image:IntegratedRailTransitIcon.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia site on the same subject http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Express_Rail_Link

Is this intentionally? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.194.34.103 (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Express Rail Link covers both KLIA Ekspres and the KLIA Transit service. I wouldn't be opposed to merging the three though... Jpatokal (talk) 01:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KLIA Ekspres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KLIA Ekspres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]