Talk:James Madison Institute

Politics: American / Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

JMIFlorida (talk · contribs)

February 2013

I've rolled back the edits by user JMIFlorida. Not that I think they are disruptive, but as a new editor JMIFlorida is not familiar with various WP policies & guidelines. The edits are primarily WP:NOTDIRECTORY types. E.g., the posting of the JMI staff directory, including ALL CAPS, is not appropriate. I also posted a COI welcome message on JMIFlorida's talk page. – S. Rich (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions

Stemming from their stances on a multitude of different public policy issues in conjunction with their organization's mission statement, Sal Nuzzo, vice president of JMI said "For the past few years as we've worked in the criminal justice arena, we have experienced first hand the changing debate on these issues. The poll solidified what we've come to know --- Floridians want criminal justice reform."[29] This public opinion survey Mr. Nuzzo was referring to, was a poll of 1,488 Florida residents utilizing an opt-in Web-based panel which ended up with results that reflected the dissatisfaction with the current system. Results included:

72 percent agreed or strongly agreed that it is important to reform the criminal justice system in Florida 75 percent of Floridians agree or strongly agree that the prison population is costing our country too much money 72 percent believe felons should be able to get licenses to work after they finish serving their sentences 74 percent believe prisons should focus more on rehabilitation than punishment (Utilizing information from:

- https://www.charleskochinstitute.org/majority-floridians-agree-criminal-justice-reform-now/)

Maxwell moilanen (talk) 06:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Max[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Madison Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150304202406/http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/conservative-james-madison-institute-expands-across-florida to http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/conservative-james-madison-institute-expands-across-florida

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James Madison Institute - Conservative

I have added the conservative title back as the references clearly show that is what they are refereed to by many. None of them say "free market" so not sure why that is being added? ContentEditman (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please list the sources and where you think this is substantiated. Also, one small detail, but one that shows your haste in editing, why do you keep saying "Conservative" with a capital "C" and not "conservative", even if the label does apply? Iljhgtn (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, per WP:ONUS please at least self revert until consensus is reached for the addition of "conservative" on this article AND that it be added in the lead per WP:WEIGHT. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:15, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are already there. The first reference, number 2 at this time, says "A conservative think tank based in Florida". None of them call them "free market". Where are you getting that? You violated 3rr with your edits and they are not supported by references. ContentEditman (talk) 02:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Response to third opinion request:

Describing the James Madison Institute as a "conservative think tank" appears to be in line with the sources and the body of in the article. I hope that helps, Thanks! Nemov (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC) Nemov (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]