Talk:Ivysaur

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• List of generation I Pokémon
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:List of generation I Pokémon

Pokémon

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon

Video games: Nintendo

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

This redirect is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Super Penguins (3 participants)
Double Fine Comics (1 participant)
WiiLink (3 participants)
Westballz (1 participant)
Temmie Chang (8 participants)
Greg Martin (artist) (4 participants)
PKHeX (6 participants)
List of James Bond villains (9 participants)
List of Pokémon volumes (3 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA

Ivysaur is a GA. Before nominating it for FA, simply expand it. I reccomend creating a "Other Media" section. Some P. E rson 13:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA/R

I've filed a Good Article review over this article, no comment was given on the talk page, and like Charizard, the edit summary does not explain how usage of guidebook type references causes this article to not even be marginally well-referenced. Homestarmy 00:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter? The fact remains that there's unnecessary fluff throughout the article (for instance, stating what he's strong and weak against is guide content). And of course, guide content - what use is it to a non-fan that Bulbasaur is good versus the first four gym leaders? There is a review - it has too much information, it's going to become merged, and his name origin is completely unreferenced. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Before making any major edits, test them out at User:Permethius/Sandbox.Thanks an Peace Out-67.149.191.128 (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]