Jump to content

Talk:Iloveoov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Iloveoov (video gamer))

Requested move 15 January 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Iloveoov (video gamer)Choi Yeon-sung – He is well known as real name now. Kanghuitari (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Choi Yeon-sung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 May 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 08:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Choi Yeon-sungIloveoov – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Last move rationale was speculative, at best, and the support vote "more encyclopedic" is not a policy.

In regards to news articles:

  • Google news search results for "Choi Yeon-sung" starcraft: 2 results
  • Google news search results for iloveoov starcraft: 248 results. Pbrks (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. StarCraft journalism almost exclusively refers to players by their screennames, and League journalism does 95% of the time. See [1] for a sample article that mentions the real name once and then proceeds to refer to the person as iloveoov in the title and in running text. At least for BoxeR he had a career elsewhere under his normal name, although I'd argue that should be moved back to the screenname as well. As far as "more encyclopedic": see the many, many actors who are uncontroversially at their "stage names" - we don't have Francis Sinatra, Stefani Germanotta, etc., we use the names they are known and self-present to the public as, so WP:ABOUTSELF applies too, not merely WP:COMMONNAME. SnowFire (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as a WP:COMMONNAME: In English (as opposed to in Korean, which is a different story) he is generally known and referred to by his ID iloveoov rather than his real name. Adumbrativus (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.