Talk:Huacachina

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Picture

Hi, I have a picture that I think is a bit more clear and colourful. Would you mind if I uploaded it? And how do I do it?

Good - the current photo isn't so hot. Start here: Special:Upload - DavidWBrooks 15:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The picture that is on the page right now looks completely photoshopped, the sky is a really fake blue and it contrasts highly with the reflections in the water. Plus the fact that there has never been a blue sky over Huacachina. I'm gonna wait for a week for answers and then change it to something more appropriate. Hdezela (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

There used to be a better photo, a long time back. I agree that this one looks faked - or, at the very least, crummy. (Heck, I took better ones with my point-and-shoot.) If you've got a better one, please use it, but don't forget to make it clear that it can be used here, or the photo-Nazi bots will remove it. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/25/huacachina_n_6753972.html ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The actual source for that article is another article dated 2013 ... it's just a typical Huffpost cut-and-paste ... what's the situation now, does anybody know? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huacachina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160812013402/http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2016/07/06/peruvian-scientist-who-revived-wetlands-aims-to-clean-up-lake-titicaca/ to http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2016/07/06/peruvian-scientist-who-revived-wetlands-aims-to-clean-up-lake-titicaca/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marino Morikawa

Does anybody know if Marino Morikawa actually did anything at Huacahina? I can't find any good confirmation online. Having a three-year-old item saying he plans to do something seems silly. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18 months later, no news. I've added a sentence that the project doesn't seem to have gone forward. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:13, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]