Talk:Hu Die

Hu Die has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 5, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Hu Die appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 March 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Movie Queen" Butterfly Wu (pictured) became the mistress of China's spymaster Dai Li and the mother-in-law of President Li Zongren?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hu Die.

Wikipedia

Needs plenty of work

For one think, the article enlists that she was "a famous actress" but there are only two selected films and one of them are lost films. Also, if she were famous, I would be sure that the article were to be at least one section longer. Looking at research, she apparently was pretty popular when she was around, but three sentences are not enough. Also like the heading says, the article needs more sources. Ug5151 (talk) 20:09, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right, Ug5151. Unfortunately Wikipedia's coverage of Chinese topics is very poor, and numerous famous people and important topics don't even have a page. I'll try to expand the article for Women's History Month. -Zanhe (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

The Chinese Wikipedia quotes 23 March 1908. All the other language Wikipedias say 1907 (just the year). Is there a definitive source? Periglio (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Chinese wiki article is largely unsourced, so not sure where that date came from. Encyclopedia of China says she was born in 1908, but Encyclopedia of Chinese Film says 1907. The discrepancy could be caused by the common confusion of Chinese calendar dates with Western calendar ones. Neither source gives a definitive date. -Zanhe (talk) 18:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hu Die/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheFame08 (talk · contribs) 13:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article now! TheFame08 (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I can't see the problem in this article. Congrats Zanhe, this article have passed

. TheFame08 (talk) 13:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]