A fact from How Not to Be a Boy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Men's Issues, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Men's Issues articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Men's IssuesWikipedia:WikiProject Men's IssuesTemplate:WikiProject Men's IssuesMen's Issues
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
How Not to Be a Boy is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Thanks for the review. I can't eliminate the quoting entirely, and some degree of it is standard in all the quality-reviewed book articles I've seen or worked on. But I agree that there was significant overreliance on quotes, so I've tried to rewrite in my own words everywhere except where it's difficult to do so without close paraphrasing, taking a person out of context or introducing neutrality concerns. I'm not sure what I can say to describe Turnbull other than "a BBC morning news presenter" (already present). "The Trick" is essentially just their slang term for patriarchy (the particular conception of patriarchy that he and his wife have). This was quite unclear, so I've rephrased in the article and suggested an alt below in line with that.
ALT3: ... that Robert Webb explains in his memoir How Not to Be a Boy (2017) how he and his wife talk about the patriarchy with their two daughters, calling it "The Trick"?
I'm marking this ready with the changes and ALT3 is acceptable too. @Bilorv: As for Bill Turnbull, as someone not familiar with this person, reading that particular part of the article leaves me confused why Webb would single out Turnbull as the one to explain it to. Is Turnbull someone who is particularly hard to convince? Is he the "average guy" stand-in? Maybe that can be elaborated more for people like me. Regards SoWhy15:32, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anything more is original research on my part. I think the description as an "average guy stand-in" is pretty accurate. To say he's recognisable to most people in Britain would be an understatement (he's more known than any American news host would be in America because we have only two dominant breakfast news channels), but for anyone outside, "BBC morning news presenter" conveys the majority of the relevant information in this thought. — Bilorv (talk) 16:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]